This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62025TN0587
Case T-587/25: Action brought on 23 August 2025 – Ola Energy v Council
Case T-587/25: Action brought on 23 August 2025 – Ola Energy v Council
Case T-587/25: Action brought on 23 August 2025 – Ola Energy v Council
OJ C, C/2025/5363, 13.10.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5363/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/5363 |
13.10.2025 |
Action brought on 23 August 2025 – Ola Energy v Council
(Case T-587/25)
(C/2025/5363)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ola Energy Holding Ltd (Floréal, Mauritius) (represented by: A. Bahrami and N. Korogiannakis, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Declare the action for annulment admissible and well founded; |
|
— |
Annul the Decision of the Council dated 13 June 2025 (SGS 25 / 2281) refusing to transpose into the EU legal order the Implementation Assistance Notice No 1 of 7 March 2012, issued by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to Resolution 1970 (2011) concerning Libya; |
|
— |
In the alternative, declare that the Council has infringed the Treaties, in breach of Article 265 TFEU, by failing to adopt a measure to amend or clarify Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 following the applicant’s formal request of 11 March 2025; |
|
— |
Order the Council to pay all the legal fees and costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on nine pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to comply with binding UN Security Council Resolutions. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty. |
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to review restrictive measures. |
|
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment. |
|
7. |
Seventh plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment. |
|
8. |
Eighth plea in law, alleging error of law. |
|
9. |
Alternatively, alleging a failure to act under Article 265 TFEU. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5363/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)