Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62025CN0190

Case C-190/25, Zelabrich: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 10 March 2025 – LS v GT

OJ C, C/2025/3393, 30.6.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3393/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3393/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3393

30.6.2025

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 10 March 2025 – LS v GT

(Case C-190/25, Zelabrich)  (1)

(C/2025/3393)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: LS

Respondent: GT

Questions referred

1.

Do Italian proceedings on the recognition of civil effects before the competent Corte d’Appello in Naples under Article 8(2) of the Agreement of 18 February 1984 between the Holy See and the Italian Republic, amending the ‘Concordato lateranense’ of 11 February 1929, constitute proceedings relating to marriage annulment within the meaning of Article 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (Brussels IIa Regulation)? (2)

2.

If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative:

Is a court first seised in Germany concerning a divorce to be decreed permitted, contrary to Article 19(1) of the Brussels IIa Regulation, to stay its proceedings under national rules in favour of the court second seised which has to rule on recognition of civil effects proceedings?

(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3393/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top