Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62025TN0115

Case T-115/25: Action brought on 17 February 2025 – Twinset v EUIPO – Christian Dior Couture (T inside a horizontal ellipse)

OJ C, C/2025/1899, 7.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1899/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1899/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1899

7.4.2025

Action brought on 17 February 2025 – Twinset v EUIPO – Christian Dior Couture (T inside a horizontal ellipse)

(Case T-115/25)

(C/2025/1899)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Twinset SpA (Carpi, Italy) (represented by: I. Gatto, E. Barone and A. Landi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Christian Dior Couture SA (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark T inside a horizontal ellipse – Application for registration No 18 659 646

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 December 2024 in Case R 251/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1899/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top