Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN1141

Case T-1141/23: Action brought on 7 December 2023 — Schöffel Sportbekleidung v EUIPO — BV (Schöffel Ich bin raus.)

OJ C, C/2024/974, 29.1.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/974/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/974/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/974

29.1.2024

Action brought on 7 December 2023 — Schöffel Sportbekleidung v EUIPO — BV (Schöffel Ich bin raus.)

(Case T-1141/23)

(C/2024/974)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Schöffel Sportbekleidung GmbH (Schwabmünchen, Germany) (represented by: P. Klein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BV

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark Schöffel Ich bin raus. — International registration designating the European Union No 1 125 107

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 October 2023 in Case R 237/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision and amend it to the effect that the complaint is rejected and the application for revocation of 6 June 2021 is dismissed as inadmissible;

—

order the other party to pay the costs; in the alternative, order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

—

Abuse of rights and abuse of process in conjunction with Article 107 in conjunction with Article 58(1)(a), Article 63(1)(a), Article 182, Article 198 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/974/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top