This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TN1111
Case T-1111/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — EuroChem Group v Council
Case T-1111/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — EuroChem Group v Council
Case T-1111/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — EuroChem Group v Council
OJ C, C/2024/764, 22.1.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/764/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
|
C/2024/764 |
22.1.2024 |
Action brought on 24 November 2023 — EuroChem Group v Council
(Case T-1111/23)
(C/2024/764)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: EuroChem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Tuominen and M. Krestiyanova, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
partially annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (1) and Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (2) by removing the following phrases from the contested statements:
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment when including the applicant’s name in the statement of reasons of the lists of the persons to whom restrictive measures apply. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons when adopting the contested measures. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right of defence, of the right to a fair hearing, in that they do not provide the applicant with the possibility to effectively exercise its right of defence, in particular the right to be heard, and of the right to an effective judicial remedy. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the impact of the contested acts on the applicant is disproportionate and infringes Articles 16 and 17 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. |
(1) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 226, p. 3).
(2) Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 226, p. 104).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/764/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)