Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0407

Case T-407/24: Action brought on 5 August 2024 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Alpian (+a)

OJ C, C/2024/5431, 16.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5431/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5431/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5431

16.9.2024

Action brought on 5 August 2024 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Alpian (+a)

(Case T-407/24)

(C/2024/5431)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: AirPlus International GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alpian SA (Geneva, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark +a – International registration designating the European Union No 1 528 680

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2024 in Case R 1257/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal as well as before the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) as well as of Articles 94 and 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and of the principle of fair proceedings;

—

Infringement of Article 96 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5431/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top