This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0053
Case T-53/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO — de Gea Quintana (DDG)
Case T-53/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO — de Gea Quintana (DDG)
Case T-53/24: Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO — de Gea Quintana (DDG)
OJ C, C/2024/2169, 25.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2169/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
|
C/2024/2169 |
25.3.2024 |
Action brought on 5 February 2024 — Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO — de Gea Quintana (DDG)
(Case T-53/24)
(C/2024/2169)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Schmidt Spiele GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Urek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: David de Gea Quintana (Hale Barns, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark DDG — Application for registration No 18 567 763
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2023 in Case R 1039/2023-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 28 September 2021; |
|
— |
refer the case back to EUIPO; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2169/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)