Ce document est extrait du site web EUR-Lex
Document 62023CN0776
Case C-776/23 P: Appeal brought on 14 December 2023 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2023 in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission
Case C-776/23 P: Appeal brought on 14 December 2023 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2023 in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission
Case C-776/23 P: Appeal brought on 14 December 2023 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2023 in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission
OJ C, C/2024/1540, 26.2.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1540/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
|
C/2024/1540 |
26.2.2024 |
Appeal brought on 14 December 2023 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2023 in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission
(Case C-776/23 P)
(C/2024/1540)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
set aside the judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2023 in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission (EU:T:2023:582); |
|
— |
dismiss the action for annulment in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission; |
|
— |
order the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission at first instance and on appeal. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
The appellant puts forward two grounds of appeal and claims that the General Court made the following errors of law:
|
1. |
Error of law as regards the scope of the initial decisions, by failing to take account of the information provided by the Member State (first ground of appeal), and |
|
2. |
Error of law as regards the effect of a binding administrative practice, by finding that it cannot broaden the scope of an aid scheme (second ground of appeal). |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1540/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)