L'accesso al diritto dell'Unione europea
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">Per saperne di più sull'angolo delle funzioni sperimentali</a>
Scegli le funzioni sperimentali da provare
EUR-Lex
L'accesso al diritto dell'Unione europea

Questo documento è un estratto del sito web EUR-Lex.

Siete qui
Utilizzare le virgolette per cercare una "frase esatta". Aggiungere un asterisco (*) a un termine di ricerca per trovarne le varianti (recep*, 32019R*). Utilizzare un punto interrogativo (?) al posto di un determinato carattere nella ricerca per trovare le possibili varianti (cercando "ca?o" si trovano i seguenti risultati: caso, capo, calo).
Consigli per la ricerca
Servono più opzioni di ricerca? Utilizzare la Ricerca avanzata

Documento 62023TN0510

Case T-510/23: Action brought on 18 August 2023 — RHEA Group Technologies v Commission

OJ C, C/2023/65, 9.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/65/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/65/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/65

9.10.2023

Action brought on 18 August 2023 — RHEA Group Technologies v Commission

(Case T-510/23)

(C/2023/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rhea Group Technologies (Machelen, Belgium) (represented by: S. Gerber, M. Werner and I. Kampouridi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the decision of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology of 23 March 2023; (1)

—

order the defendant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in connection with the application for annulment of the contested decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging the infringement of the essential procedural requirement to provide reasons.

—

The Commission’s decision dated 23 March 2023 infringes the duty to provide reasons pursuant to Article 296 TFEU, Article 200(7) of the EU Financial Regulation (2) and Article 41(2) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A breach of this principle constitutes a violation of an essential procedural requirement for the purposes of judicial review pursuant to Article 263, paragraph 2, TFEU.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging the infringement of the Treaties or any rule of law relating to their application.

—

Further, or alternatively, and to the extent necessary, in support of its action the applicant alleges that the Commission has misapplied its Guidance on participation in EU restricted calls and has therefore infringed a rule of law relating to the application of the Treaties pursuant to Article 263(2) TFEU. By misapplying this Guidance, the Commission has also violated the general EU law principles of non-discrimination/ equal treatment and legal certainty

(1)  The contested decision is a rejection decision relating to the tender procedure DIGITAL-2021-QCI-01-EUROQCI-QKD (‘Coordinate the first deployment of national EuroQCI projects and prepare the large-scale QKD testing and certification infrastructure’).

(2)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/65/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

In alto