Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0570

Case T-570/23: Action brought on 15 September 2023 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO — ePlus (e.plus)

OJ C, C/2023/352, 30.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/352/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/352/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/352

30.10.2023

Action brought on 15 September 2023 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO — ePlus (e.plus)

(Case T-570/23)

(C/2023/352)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: P. Neuwald, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ePlus Inc. (Herndon, Virginia, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark e.plus — European Union trade mark No 1 132 299

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2023 in joined cases R 1199/2022-1 and R 1711/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

partially annul and alter the contested decision insofar that the use of the contested mark has been demonstrated for the following services of class 38 in total: telecommunications; operating telecommunications networks;

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal of the EUIPO;

—

order any intervener to bear its own costs.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/352/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top