English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
C-221/19
Case C-221/19
C-221/19
Court of Justice
Status: In progress
C-221/19
Court of Justice
Status: In progress
/
CASE BROUGHT
- Title
- Case C-221/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 11 March 2019 — Criminal proceedings against AV
19/08/2019
PROCEEDINGS
- Title
- Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 8 October 2020. AV. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(2) and (4): – Article 17(1) and (2) – Article 19 – Taking into account, for the purposes of an aggregate sentence, of a conviction delivered in another Member State, which must be enforced in the Member State in which that judgment is delivered – Conditions – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(3) – Concept of ‘interference with a sentence or its execution’ which must be taken into account in the event of new criminal proceedings initiated in a Member State other than that in which the ruling was delivered. Case C-221/19.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2020:815
- Advocate General
- Richard de la Tour
08/10/2020
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2021. AV. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(2) and (4): – Article 17(1) and (2) – Article 19 – Taking into account, for the purposes of an aggregate sentence, of a conviction delivered in another Member State, which must be enforced in the Member State in which that judgment is delivered – Conditions – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(3) – Concept of ‘interference with a sentence or its execution’ which must be taken into account in the event of new criminal proceedings initiated in a Member State other than that in which the ruling was delivered. Case C-221/19.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2021:278
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Piçarra
- Type of procedure
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Complementary documents:
15/04/2021