Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022CN0785

Case C-785/22 P: Appeal brought on 27 December 2022 by Eulex Kosovo against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 October 2022 in Case T-242/17 RENV, SC v Eulex Kosovo

OJ C 112, 27.3.2023, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

27.3.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/26

Appeal brought on 27 December 2022 by Eulex Kosovo against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 October 2022 in Case T-242/17 RENV, SC v Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-785/22 P)

(2023/C 112/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Eulex Kosovo (represented by: L.-G. Wigemark, Agent, and E. Raoult, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: SC

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

—

allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal in its entirety;

—

dismiss the claim in its entirety;

—

order SC to pay the costs of the proceedings in cases T-242/17, C-730/18, T-242/17 RENV and those related to the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on several sets of observations on the judgment under appeal:

—

observations on the General Court's submissions on the admissibility of SC’s claim;

—

observations on the General Court's findings in the judgment by default concerning the jurisdiction of the General Court and on the admissibility of SC’s application;

—

objections to the General Court's assessment of the merits of the claim; and

—

observations on the General Court’s findings regarding SC’s claims for compensation.
Top