This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32012D0134
2012/134/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the manufacture of glass (notified under document C(2012) 865) Text with EEA relevance
2012/134/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the manufacture of glass (notified under document C(2012) 865) Text with EEA relevance
2012/134/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 28 February 2012 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the manufacture of glass (notified under document C(2012) 865) Text with EEA relevance
OJ L 70, 8.3.2012, p. 1–62
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV) This document has been published in a special edition(s)
(HR)
In force
8.3.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 70/1 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 28 February 2012
establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the manufacture of glass
(notified under document C(2012) 865)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2012/134/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1) and in particular Article 13(5) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the Commission to organise an exchange of information on industrial emissions between it and Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection in order to facilitate the drawing up of best available techniques (BAT) reference documents as defined in Article 3(11) of that Directive. |
(2) |
In accordance with Article 13(2) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the exchange of information is to address the performance of installations and techniques in terms of emissions, expressed as short- and long-term averages, where appropriate, and the associated reference conditions, consumption and nature of raw materials, water consumption, use of energy and generation of waste and the techniques used, associated monitoring, cross-media effects, economic and technical viability and developments therein and best available techniques and emerging techniques identified after considering the issues mentioned in points (a) and (b) of Article 13(2) of that Directive. |
(3) |
‘BAT conclusions’ as defined in Article 3(12) of Directive 2010/75/EU are the key element of BAT reference documents and lay down the conclusions on best available techniques, their description, information to assess their applicability, the emission levels associated with the best available techniques, associated monitoring, associated consumption levels and, where appropriate, relevant site remediation measures. |
(4) |
In accordance with Article 14(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, BAT conclusions are to be the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter 2 of that Directive. |
(5) |
Article 15(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the competent authority to set emission limit values that ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the decisions on BAT conclusions referred to in Article 13(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU. |
(6) |
Article 15(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU provides for derogations from the requirement laid down in Article 15(3) only where the costs associated with the achievement of emissions levels disproportionately outweigh the environmental benefits due to the geographical location, the local environmental conditions or the technical characteristics of the installation concerned. |
(7) |
Article 16(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU provides that the monitoring requirements in the permit referred to in point (c) of Article 14(1) of the Directive are to be based on the conclusions on monitoring as described in the BAT conclusions. |
(8) |
In accordance with Article 21(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, within 4 years of publication of decisions on BAT conclusions, the competent authority is to reconsider and, if necessary, update all the permit conditions and ensure that the installation complies with those permit conditions. |
(9) |
Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (2) established a forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection. |
(10) |
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the Commission obtained the opinion (3) of that forum on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for the manufacture of glass on 13 September 2011 and made it publicly available. |
(11) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The BAT conclusions for the manufacture of glass are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 February 2012.
For the Commission
Janez POTOČNIK
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
(2) OJ C 146, 17.5.2011, p. 3.
(3) http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article
ANNEX
BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF GLASS
SCOPE | 6 |
DEFINITIONS | 6 |
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS | 6 |
Averaging periods and reference conditions for air emissions | 6 |
Conversion to reference oxygen concentration | 7 |
Conversion from concentrations to specific mass emissions | 8 |
Definitions for certain air pollutants | 9 |
Averaging periods for waste water discharges | 9 |
1.1. |
General BAT conclusions for the glass manufacturing industry | 9 |
1.1.1. |
Environmental management systems | 9 |
1.1.2. |
Energy efficiency | 10 |
1.1.3. |
Materials storage and handling | 11 |
1.1.4. |
General primary techniques | 12 |
1.1.5. |
Emissions to water from glass manufacturing processes | 14 |
1.1.6. |
Waste from the glass manufacturing processes | 16 |
1.1.7. |
Noise from the glass manufacturing processes | 17 |
1.2. |
BAT conclusions for container glass manufacturing | 17 |
1.2.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 17 |
1.2.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 17 |
1.2.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 20 |
1.2.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 20 |
1.2.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 21 |
1.2.6. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 21 |
1.3. |
BAT conclusions for flat glass manufacturing | 23 |
1.3.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 23 |
1.3.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 23 |
1.3.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 25 |
1.3.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 26 |
1.3.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 26 |
1.3.6. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 27 |
1.4. |
BAT conclusions for continuous filament glass fibre manufacturing | 28 |
1.4.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 28 |
1.4.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 29 |
1.4.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 29 |
1.4.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 30 |
1.4.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 31 |
1.4.6. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 31 |
1.5. |
BAT conclusions for domestic glass manufacturing | 32 |
1.5.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 32 |
1.5.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 33 |
1.5.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 35 |
1.5.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 35 |
1.5.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 36 |
1.5.6. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 38 |
1.6. |
BAT conclusions for special glass manufacturing | 39 |
1.6.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 39 |
1.6.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 39 |
1.6.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 42 |
1.6.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 42 |
1.6.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 43 |
1.6.6. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 43 |
1.7. |
BAT conclusions for mineral wool manufacturing | 44 |
1.7.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 44 |
1.7.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 45 |
1.7.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 46 |
1.7.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 47 |
1.7.5. |
Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) from stone wool melting furnaces | 48 |
1.7.6. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 48 |
1.7.7. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 49 |
1.8. |
BAT conclusions for high temperature insulation wools (HTIW) manufacturing | 50 |
1.8.1. |
Dust emissions from melting and downstream processes | 50 |
1.8.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting and downstream processes | 51 |
1.8.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting and downstream processes | 52 |
1.8.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 52 |
1.8.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces and downstream processes | 53 |
1.8.6. |
Volatile organic compounds from downstream processes | 53 |
1.9. |
BAT conclusions for frits manufacturing | 54 |
1.9.1. |
Dust emissions from melting furnaces | 54 |
1.9.2. |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from melting furnaces | 54 |
1.9.3. |
Sulphur oxides (SOX) from melting furnaces | 55 |
1.9.4. |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) from melting furnaces | 56 |
1.9.5. |
Metals from melting furnaces | 56 |
1.9.6. |
Emissions from downstream processes | 57 |
Glossary: | 58 |
1.10. |
Description of techniques | 58 |
1.10.1. |
Dust emissions | 58 |
1.10.2. |
NOX emissions | 58 |
1.10.3. |
SOX emissions | 60 |
1.10.4. |
HCl, HF emissions | 60 |
1.10.5. |
Metal emissions | 60 |
1.10.6. |
Combined gaseous emissions (e.g. SOX, HCl, HF, boron compounds) | 61 |
1.10.7. |
Combined emissions (solid + gaseous) | 61 |
1.10.8. |
Emissions from cutting, grinding, polishing operations | 61 |
1.10.9. |
H2S, VOC emissions | 62 |
SCOPE
These BAT conclusions concern the industrial activities specified in Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU, namely:
— |
|
— |
|
These BAT conclusions do not address the following activities:
— |
Production of water glass, covered by the reference document Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Solids and Other Industry (LVIC-S) |
— |
Production of polycrystalline wool |
— |
Production of mirrors, covered by the reference document Surface Treatment Using Organic Solvents (STS) |
Other reference documents which are of relevance for the activities covered by these BAT conclusions are the following:
Reference documents |
Activity |
Emissions from Storage (EFS) |
Storage and handling of raw materials |
Energy Efficiency (ENE) |
General energy efficiency |
Economic and Cross-Media Effects (ECM) |
Economics and cross-media effects of techniques |
General Principles of Monitoring (MON) |
Emissions and consumption monitoring |
The techniques listed and described in these BAT conclusions are neither prescriptive nor exhaustive. Other techniques may be used that ensure at least an equivalent level of environmental protection.
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following definitions apply:
Term used |
Definition |
New plant |
A plant introduced on the site of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a plant on the existing foundations of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions |
Existing plant |
A plant which is not a new plant |
New furnace |
A furnace introduced on the site of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete rebuild of a furnace following the publication of these BAT conclusions |
Normal furnace rebuild |
A rebuild between campaigns without a significant change in furnace requirements or technology and in which the furnace frame is not significantly adjusted and the furnace dimensions remain basically unchanged. The refractory of the furnace and, where appropriate, the regenerators are repaired by the full or partial replacement of the material. |
Complete furnace rebuild |
A rebuild involving a major change in the furnace requirements or technology and with major adjustment or replacement of the furnace and associated equipments. |
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Averaging periods and reference conditions for air emissions
Unless stated otherwise, emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for air emissions given in these BAT conclusions apply under the reference conditions shown in Table 1. All values for concentrations in waste gases refer to standard conditions: dry gas, temperature 273,15 K, pressure 101,3 kPa.
For discontinuous measurements |
BAT-AELs refer to the average value of three spot samples of at least 30 minutes each; for regenerative furnaces the measuring period should cover a minimum of two firing reversals of the regenerator chambers |
For continuous measurements |
BAT-AELs refer to daily average values |
Table 1
Reference conditions for BAT-AELs concerning air emissions
Activities |
Unit |
Reference conditions |
|
Melting activities |
Conventional melting furnace in continuous melters |
mg/Nm3 |
8 % oxygen by volume |
Conventional melting furnace in discontinuous melters |
mg/Nm3 |
13 % oxygen by volume |
|
Oxy-fuel-fired furnaces |
kg/tonne melted glass |
The expression of emission levels measured as mg/Nm3 to a reference oxygen concentration is not applicable |
|
Electric furnaces |
mg/Nm3 or kg/tonne melted glass |
The expression of emission levels measured as mg/Nm3 to a reference oxygen concentration is not applicable |
|
Frit melting furnaces |
mg/Nm3 or kg/tonne melted frit |
Concentrations refer to 15 % oxygen by volume. When air-gas firing is used, BAT AELs expressed as emission concentration (mg/Nm3) apply. When only oxy-fuel firing is employed, BAT AELs expressed as specific mass emissions (kg/tonne melted frit) apply. When oxygen-enriched air-fuel firing is used, BAT AELs expressed as either emission concentration (mg/Nm3) or as specific mass emissions (kg/tonne melted frit) apply |
|
All type of furnaces |
kg/tonne melted glass |
The specific mass emissions refer to 1 tonne of melted glass |
|
Non-melting activities, including downstream processes |
All processes |
mg/Nm3 |
No correction for oxygen |
All processes |
kg/tonne glass |
The specific mass emissions refer to 1 tonne of produced glass |
Conversion to reference oxygen concentration
The formula for calculating the emissions concentration at a reference oxygen level (see Table 1) is shown below.
Where:
ER (mg/Nm3) |
: |
emissions concentration corrected to the reference oxygen level OR |
OR (vol %) |
: |
reference oxygen level |
EM (mg/Nm3) |
: |
emissions concentration referred to the measured oxygen level OM |
OM (vol %) |
: |
measured oxygen level. |
Conversion from concentrations to specific mass emissions
BAT-AELs given in Sections 1.2 to 1.9 as specific mass emissions (kg/tonne melted glass) are based on the calculation reported below except for oxy-fuel fired furnaces and, in a limited number of cases, for electric melting where BAT-AELs given in kg/tonne melted glass were derived from specific reported data.
The calculation procedure used for the conversion from concentrations to specific mass emissions is shown below.
Specific mass emission (kg/tonne of melted glass) = conversion factor × emissions concentration (mg/Nm3)
Where: conversion factor = (Q/P) × 10–6
with |
|
The waste gas volume (Q) is determined by the specific energy consumption, type of fuel, and the oxidant (air, air enriched by oxygen and oxygen with purity depending on the production process). The energy consumption is a complex function of (predominantly) the type of furnace, the type of glass and the cullet percentage.
However, a range of factors can influence the relationship between concentration and specific mass flow, including:
— |
type of furnace (air preheating temperature, melting technique) |
— |
type of glass produced (energy requirement for melting) |
— |
energy mix (fossil fuel/electric boosting) |
— |
type of fossil fuel (oil, gas) |
— |
type of oxidant (oxygen, air, oxygen-enriched air) |
— |
cullet percentage |
— |
batch composition |
— |
age of the furnace |
— |
furnace size. |
The conversion factors given in Table 2 have been used for converting BAT-AELs from concentrations into specific mass emissions.
The conversion factors have been determined on the basis of energy efficient furnaces and relate only to full air/fuel-fired furnaces.
Table 2
Indicative factors used for converting mg/Nm3 into kg/tonne of melted glass based on energy efficient fuel-air furnaces
Sectors |
Factors to convert mg/Nm3 into kg/tonne of melted glass |
|
Flat glass |
2,5 × 10–3 |
|
Container glass |
General case |
1,5 × 10–3 |
Specific cases (1) |
Case-by-case study (often 3,0 × 10–3) |
|
Continuous filament glass fibre |
4,5 × 10–3 |
|
Domestic glass |
Soda lime |
2,5 × 10–3 |
Specific cases (2) |
Case-by-case study (between 2,5 and > 10 × 10–3; often 3,0 × 10–3) |
|
Mineral wool |
Glass wool |
2 × 10–3 |
Stone wool cupola |
2,5 × 10–3 |
|
Special glass |
TV glass (panels) |
3 × 10–3 |
TV glass (funnel) |
2,5 × 10–3 |
|
Borosilicate (tube) |
4 × 10–3 |
|
Glass ceramics |
6,5 × 10–3 |
|
Lighting glass (soda-lime) |
2,5 × 10–3 |
|
Frits |
Case-by-case study (between 5 – 7,5 × 10–3) |
DEFINITIONS FOR CERTAIN AIR POLLUTANTS
For the purpose of these BAT conclusions and for the BAT-AELs reported in Sections 1.2 to 1.9, the following definitions apply:
NOX expressed as NO2 |
The sum of nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) expressed as NO2 |
SOX expressed as SO2 |
The sum of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and sulphur trioxide (SO3) expressed as SO2 |
Hydrogen chloride expressed as HCl |
All gaseous chlorides expressed as HCl |
Hydrogen fluoride expressed as HF |
All gaseous fluorides expressed as HF |
AVERAGING PERIODS FOR WASTE WATER DISCHARGES
Unless stated otherwise, emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for waste water emissions given in these BAT conclusions refer to the average value of a composite sample taken over a period of 2 hours or 24 hours.
1.1. General BAT conclusions for the manufacture of glass
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all installations.
The process-specific BAT included in Sections 1.2 – 1.9 apply in addition to the general BAT mentioned in this section.
1.1.1.
1. BAT is to implement and adhere to an environmental management system (EMS) that incorporates all of the following features:
(i) |
commitment of the management, including senior management; |
(ii) |
definition of an environmental policy that includes the continuous improvement for the installation by the management; |
(iii) |
planning and establishing the necessary procedures, objectives and targets, in conjunction with financial planning and investment; |
(iv) |
implementation of the procedures paying particular attention to:
|
(v) |
checking performance and taking corrective action, paying particular attention to:
|
(vi) |
review of the EMS and its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness by senior management; |
(vii) |
following the development of cleaner technologies; |
(viii) |
consideration for the environmental impacts from the eventual decommissioning of the installation at the stage of designing a new plant, and throughout its operating life; |
(ix) |
application of sectoral benchmarking on a regular basis. |
Applicability
The scope (e.g. level of details) and nature of the EMS (e.g. standardised or non-standardised) will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have.
1.1.2.
2. BAT is to reduce the specific energy consumption by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
|||
|
Applicable for new plants. For existing plants, the implementation requires a complete rebuild of the furnace |
||
|
Applicable to fuel/air and oxy-fuel fired furnaces |
||
|
Not applicable to the continuous filament glass fibre, high temperature insulation wool and frits sectors |
||
|
Applicable to fuel/air and oxy-fuel fired furnaces. The applicability and economic viability of the technique is dictated by the overall efficiency that may be obtained, including the effective use of the steam generated |
||
|
Applicable to fuel/air and oxy-fuel fired furnaces. The applicability is normally restricted to batch compositions with more than 50 % cullet |
1.1.3.
3. BAT is to prevent, or where that is not practicable, to reduce diffuse dust emissions from the storage and handling of solid materials by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
I. |
Storage of raw materials
|
II. |
Handling of raw materials
|
4. BAT is to prevent, or where that is not practicable, to reduce diffuse gaseous emissions from the storage and handling of volatile raw materials by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
(i) |
Use of tank paint with low solar absorbency for bulk storage subject to temperature changes due to solar heating. |
(ii) |
Control of temperature in the storage of volatile raw materials. |
(iii) |
Tank insulation in the storage of volatile raw materials. |
(iv) |
Inventory management |
(v) |
Use of floating roof tanks in the storage of large quantities of volatile petroleum products. |
(vi) |
Use of vapour return transfer systems in the transfer of volatile fluids (e.g. from tank trucks to storage tank). |
(vii) |
Use of bladder roof tanks in the storage of liquid raw materials. |
(viii) |
Use of pressure/vacuum valves in tanks designed to withstand pressure fluctuations. |
(ix) |
Application of a release treatment (e.g. adsorption, absorption, condensation) in the storage of hazardous materials. |
(x) |
Application of subsurface filling in the storage of liquids that tend to foam. |
1.1.4.
5. BAT is to reduce energy consumption and emissions to air by carrying out a constant monitoring of the operational parameters and a programmed maintenance of the melting furnace.
Technique |
Applicability |
The technique consists of a series of monitoring and maintenance operations which can be used individually or in combination appropriate to the type of furnace, with the aim of minimising the ageing effects on the furnace, such as sealing the furnace and burner blocks, keep the maximum insulation, control the stabilised flame conditions, control the fuel/air ratio, etc. |
Applicable to regenerative, recuperative, and oxy-fuel fired furnaces. The applicability to other types of furnaces requires an installation-specific assessment |
6. BAT is to carry out a careful selection and control of all substances and raw materials entering the melting furnace in order to reduce or prevent emissions to air by using one or a combination of the following techniques.
Technique |
Applicability |
||
|
Applicable within the constraints of the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials and fuels |
||
|
|||
|
7. BAT is to carry out monitoring of emissions and/or other relevant process parameters on a regular basis, including the following:
Technique |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
|||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
8. BAT is to operate the waste gas treatment systems during normal operating conditions at optimal capacity and availability in order to prevent or reduce emissions
Applicability
Special procedures can be defined for specific operating conditions, in particular:
(i) |
during start-up and shutdown operations |
(ii) |
during other special operations which could affect the proper functioning of the systems (e.g. regular and extraordinary maintenance work and cleaning operations of the furnace and/or of the waste gas treatment system, or severe production change) |
(iii) |
in the case of insufficient waste gas flow or temperature which prevents the use of the system at full capacity. |
9. BAT is to limit carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from the melting furnace, when applying primary techniques or chemical reduction by fuel, for the reduction of NOX emissions
Technique |
Applicability |
Primary techniques for the reduction of NOX emissions are based on combustion modifications (e.g. reduction of air/fuel ratio, staged combustion low-NOX burners, etc.). Chemical reduction by fuel consists of the addition of hydrocarbon fuel to the waste gas stream to reduce the NOX formed in the furnace. The increase in CO emissions due to the application of these techniques can be limited by a careful control of the operational parameters |
Applicable to conventional air/fuel fired furnaces. |
Table 3
BAT-AELs for carbon monoxide emissions from melting furnaces
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
Carbon monoxide, expressed as CO |
< 100 mg/Nm3 |
10. BAT is to limit ammonia (NH3) emissions, when applying selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) techniques for a high efficiency NOX emissions reduction
Technique |
Applicability |
The technique consists of adopting and maintaining suitable operating conditions of the SCR or SNCR waste gas treatment systems, with the aim of limiting emissions of unreacted ammonia |
Applicable to melting furnaces fitted with SCR or SNCR |
Table 4
BAT-AELs for ammonia emissions, when SCR or SNCR techniques are applied
Parameter |
BAT-AELs (3) |
Ammonia, expressed as NH3 |
< 5 – 30 mg/Nm3 |
11. BAT is to reduce boron emissions from the melting furnace, when boron compounds are used in the batch formulation, by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (4) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability to existing plants may be limited by technical constraints associated with the position and characteristics of the existing filter system |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by a decreased removal efficiency of other gaseous pollutants (SOX, HCl, HF) caused by the deposition of boron compounds on the surface of the dry alkaline reagent |
||
|
The applicability to existing plants may be limited by the need of a specific waste water treatment |
Monitoring
The monitoring of boron emissions should be carried out according to a specific methodology which allows measurement of both solid and gaseous forms and to determine the effective removal of these species from the flue gases.
1.1.5.
12. BAT is to reduce water consumption by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique |
Applicability |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable. Recirculation of scrubbing water is applicable to most scrubbing systems; however, periodic discharge and replacement of the scrubbing medium may be necessary |
||||||
|
The applicability of this technique may be limited by the constraints associated with the safety management of the production process. In particular:
|
13. BAT is to reduce the emission load of pollutants in the waste water discharges by using one or a combination of the following waste water treatment systems:
Technique |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
The applicability is limited to the sectors which use organic substances in the production process (e.g. continuous filament glass fibre and mineral wool sectors) |
||
|
Applicable to installations where further reduction of pollutants is necessary |
||
|
The applicability is generally limited to the frits sector (possible reuse in the ceramic industry) |
Table 5
BAT-AELs for waste water discharges to surface waters from the manufacture of glass
Parameter (5) |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (6) (composite sample) |
pH |
— |
6,5 – 9 |
Total suspended solids |
mg/l |
< 30 |
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) |
mg/l |
< 5 – 130 (7) |
Sulphates, expressed as SO4 2– |
mg/l |
< 1 000 |
Fluorides, expressed as F– |
mg/l |
< 6 (8) |
Total hydrocarbons |
mg/l |
< 15 (9) |
Lead, expressed as Pb |
mg/l |
< 0,05 – 0,3 (10) |
Antimony, expressed as Sb |
mg/l |
< 0,5 |
Arsenic, expressed as As |
mg/l |
< 0,3 |
Barium, expressed as Ba |
mg/l |
< 3,0 |
Zinc, expressed as Zn |
mg/l |
< 0,5 |
Copper, expressed as Cu |
mg/l |
< 0,3 |
Chromium, expressed as Cr |
mg/l |
< 0,3 |
Cadmium, expressed as Cd |
mg/l |
< 0,05 |
Tin, expressed as Sn |
mg/l |
< 0,5 |
Nickel, expressed as Ni |
mg/l |
< 0,5 |
Ammonia, expressed as NH4 |
mg/l |
< 10 |
Boron, expressed as B |
mg/l |
< 1 – 3 |
Phenol |
mg/l |
< 1 |
1.1.6.
14. BAT is to reduce the production of solid waste to be disposed of by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique |
Applicability |
||||||||||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the quality of the final glass product |
||||||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||||||||||
|
Generally, not applicable to the continuous filament glass fibre, high temperature insulation wool and frits sectors |
||||||||||
|
The applicability may be limited by different factors:
|
||||||||||
|
Generally applicable to the domestic glass sector (for lead crystal cutting sludge) and to the container glass sector (fine particles of glass mixed with oil). Limited applicability to other glass manufacturing sectors due to unpredictable, contaminated composition, low volumes and economic viability |
||||||||||
|
The applicability is limited by the constraints imposed by the refractory manufacturers and potential end-users |
||||||||||
|
The applicability of cement bonded briquetting of waste is limited to the stone wool sector. A trade-off approach between air emissions and the generation of solid waste stream should be undertaken |
1.1.7.
15. BAT is to reduce noise emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
(i) |
Make an environmental noise assessment and formulate a noise management plan as appropriate to the local environment |
(ii) |
Enclose noisy equipment/operation in a separate structure/unit |
(iii) |
Use embankments to screen the source of noise |
(iv) |
Carry out noisy outdoor activities during the day |
(v) |
Use noise protection walls or natural barriers (trees, bushes) between the installation and the protected area, on the basis of local conditions. |
1.2. BAT conclusions for container glass manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all container glass manufacturing installations.
1.2.1.
16. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by applying a flue-gas cleaning system such as an electrostatic precipitator or a bag filter.
Technique (11) |
Applicability |
The flue-gas cleaning systems consist of end-of-pipe techniques based on the filtration of all materials that are solid at the point of measurement |
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 6
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the container glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (12) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,015 – 0,06 |
1.2.2.
17. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
I. |
primary techniques, such as:
|
II. |
secondary techniques, such as:
|
Table 7
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the container glass sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (15) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
500 – 800 |
0,75 – 1,2 |
|
Electric melting |
< 100 |
< 0,3 |
|
Oxy-fuel melting (18) |
Not applicable |
< 0,5 – 0,8 |
|
Secondary techniques |
< 500 |
< 0,75 |
18. When nitrates are used in the batch formulation and/or special oxidising combustion conditions are required in the melting furnace for ensuring the quality of the final product, BAT is to reduce NOX emissions by minimising the use of these raw materials, in combination with primary or secondary techniques
The BAT-AELs are set out in Table 7.
If nitrates are used in the batch formulation for short campaigns or for melting furnaces with a capacity of < 100 t/day, the BAT-AEL is set out in Table 8.
Technique (19) |
Applicability |
||
Primary techniques:
|
The substitution of nitrates in the batch formulation may be limited by the high costs and/or higher environmental impact of the alternative materials |
Table 8
BAT-AEL for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the container glass sector, when nitrates are used in the batch formulation and/or special oxidising combustion conditions in cases of short campaigns or for melting furnaces with a capacity of < 100 t/day
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (20) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Primary techniques |
< 1 000 |
< 3 |
1.2.3.
19. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (21) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
The minimisation of the sulphur content in the batch formulation is generally applicable within the constraints of quality requirements of the final glass product. The application of sulphur balance optimisation requires a trade-off approach between the removal of SOX emissions and the management of the solid waste (filter dust). The effective reduction of SOX emissions depends on the retention of sulphur compounds in the glass which may vary significantly depending on the glass type |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
Table 9
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the container glass sector
Parameter |
Fuel |
||
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (24) |
||
SOX expressed as SO2 |
Natural gas |
< 200 – 500 |
< 0,3 – 0,75 |
Fuel oil (25) |
< 500 – 1 200 |
< 0,75 – 1,8 |
1.2.4.
20. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace (possibly combined with flue-gases from hot-end coating activities) by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (26) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints of the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 10
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the container glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (27) |
|
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl (28) |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,02 – 0,03 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 1 – 5 |
< 0,001 – 0,008 |
1.2.5.
21. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (29) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints imposed by the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of the raw materials |
||
|
|||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 11
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the container glass sector
Parameter |
||
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (33) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 0,2 – 1 (34) |
< 0,3 – 1,5 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 1 – 5 |
< 1,5 – 7,5 × 10–3 |
1.2.6.
22. When tin, organotin or titanium compounds are used for hot-end coating operations, BAT is to reduce emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique |
Applicability |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||||||
|
The combination with flue gases from the melting furnace is generally applicable. The combination with combustion air may be affected by technical constraints due to some potential effects on the glass chemistry and on the regenerator materials |
||||||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
Table 12
BAT-AELs for air emissions from hot-end coating activities in the container glass sector when the flue-gases from downstream operations are treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Dust |
< 10 |
Titanium compounds expressed as Ti |
< 5 |
Tin compounds, including organotin, expressed as Sn |
< 5 |
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl |
< 30 |
23. When SO3 is used for surface treatment operations, BAT is to reduce SOX emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (36) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 13
BAT-AEL for SOX emissions from downstream activities when SO3 is used for surface treatment operations in the container glass sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
SOx, expressed as SO2 |
< 100 – 200 |
1.3. BAT conclusions for flat glass manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all flat glass manufacturing installations.
1.3.1.
24. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by applying an electrostatic precipitator or a bag filter system
A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.1.
Table 14
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (37) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,025 – 0,05 |
1.3.2.
25. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
I. |
primary techniques, such as:
|
II. |
secondary techniques, such as:
|
Table 15
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL (40) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (41) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Combustion modifications, Fenix process (42) |
700 – 800 |
1,75 – 2,0 |
Oxy-fuel melting (43) |
Not applicable |
< 1,25 – 2,0 |
|
Secondary techniques (44) |
400 – 700 |
1,0 – 1,75 |
26. When nitrates are used in the batch formulation, BAT is to reduce NOX emissions by minimising the use of these raw materials, in combination with primary or secondary techniques. If secondary techniques are applied, the BAT-AELs reported in Table 15 are applicable.
If nitrates are used in the batch formulation for the production of special glasses in a limited number of short campaigns, the BAT-AELs are set out in Table 16.
Technique (45) |
Applicability |
||||||
Primary techniques:
|
The substitution of nitrates in the batch formulation may be limited by the high costs and/or higher environmental impact of the alternative materials |
Table 16
BAT-AEL for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector, when nitrates are used in the batch formulation for the production of special glasses in a limited number of short campaigns
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (46) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Primary techniques |
< 1 200 |
< 3 |
1.3.3.
27. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (47) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
The minimisation of the sulphur content in the batch formulation is generally applicable within the constraints of quality requirements of the final glass product. The application of sulphur balance optimisation requires a trade-off approach between the removal of SOX emissions and the management of the solid waste (filter dust) |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
Table 17
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector
Parameter |
Fuel |
BAT-AEL (48) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (49) |
||
SOx expressedas SO2 |
Natural gas |
< 300 – 500 |
< 0,75 – 1,25 |
500 – 1 300 |
1,25 – 3,25 |
1.3.4.
28. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (52) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints of the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 18
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (53) |
|
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl (54) |
< 10 – 25 |
< 0,025 – 0,0625 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 1 – 4 |
< 0,0025 – 0,010 |
1.3.5.
29. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (55) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints imposed by the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of the raw materials. |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
Table 19
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector, with the exception of selenium coloured glasses
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (56) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (57) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 0,2 – 1 |
< 0,5 – 2,5 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 1 – 5 |
< 2,5 – 12,5 × 10–3 |
30. When selenium compounds are used for colouring the glass, BAT is to reduce selenium emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (58) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints imposed by the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of the raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
Table 20
BAT-AELs for selenium emissions from the melting furnace in the flat glass sector for the production of coloured glass
Parameter |
||
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (61) |
|
Selenium compounds, expressed as Se |
1 – 3 |
2,5 – 7,5 × 10–3 |
1.3.6.
31. BAT is to reduce emissions to air from the downstream processes by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (62) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
The techniques are generally applicable. The selection of the technique and its performance will depend on the inlet waste gas composition |
Table 21
BAT-AELs for air emissions from downstream processes in the flat glass sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Dust |
< 15 – 20 |
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl |
< 10 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 1 – 5 |
SOX, expressed as SO2 |
< 200 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 1 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 5 |
1.4. BAT conclusions for continuous filament glass fibre manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all continuous filament glass fibre manufacturing installations.
1.4.1.
The BAT-AELs reported in this section for dust refer to all materials that are solid at the point of measurement, including solid boron compounds. Gaseous boron compounds at the point of measurement are not included.
32. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (63) |
Applicability |
||
|
The application of the technique is limited by proprietary issues, since the boron-free or low-boron batch formulations are covered by a patent |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable. The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications on new plants where the positioning and characteristics of the filter may be decided without restrictions |
||
|
The application to existing plants may be limited by technical constraints; i.e. need for a specific waste water treatment plant |
Table 22
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the continuous filament glass fibre sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (64) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (65) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,045 – 0,09 |
1.4.2.
33. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (66) |
Applicability |
||||||
(i) Combustion modifications |
|||||||
|
Applicable to air/fuel conventional furnaces. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
Applicable to air/fuel conventional furnaces within the constraints of the furnace energy efficiency and higher fuel demand. Most furnaces are already of the recuperative type. |
||||||
|
Fuel staging is applicable to most air/fuel, oxy-fuel furnaces. Air staging has very limited applicability due to its technical complexity |
||||||
|
The applicability of this technique is limited to the use of special burners with automatic recirculation of the waste gas |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
The applicability is limited by the constraints associated with the availability of different types of fuel, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||||||
|
The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications at the time of a complete furnace rebuild |
Table 23
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the continuous filament glass fibre sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass |
|
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Combustion modifications |
< 600 – 1 000 |
< 2,7 – 4,5 (67) |
Oxy-fuel melting (68) |
Not applicable |
< 0,5 – 1,5 |
1.4.3.
34. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (69) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of quality requirements of the final glass product. The application of sulphur balance optimisation requires a trade-off approach between the removal of SOX emissions and the management of the solid waste (filter dust), which needs to be disposed of |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable. The presence of high concentrations of boron compounds in the flue-gases may limit the abatement efficiency of the reagent used in the dry or semi-dry scrubbing systems |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within technical constraints; i.e. need for a specific waste water treatment plant |
Table 24
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the continuous filament glass fibre sector
Parameter |
Fuel |
BAT-AEL (70) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (71) |
||
SOx expressed as SO2 |
Natural gas (72) |
< 200 – 800 |
< 0,9 – 3,6 |
< 500 – 1 000 |
< 2,25 – 4,5 |
1.4.4.
35. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (75) |
Applicability |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the batch formulation and the availability of raw materials |
||||||
|
The substitution of fluorine compounds with alternative materials is limited by quality requirements of the product |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable within technical constraints; i.e. need for a specific waste water treatment plant. |
Table 25
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the continuous filament glass fibre sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (76) |
|
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl |
< 10 |
< 0,05 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF (77) |
< 5 – 15 |
< 0,02 – 0,07 |
1.4.5.
36. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (78) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within technical constraints; i.e. need for a specific waste water treatment plant. |
Table 26
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the continuous filament glass fibre sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (79) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (80) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 0,2 – 1 |
< 0,9 – 4,5 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 1 – 3 |
< 4,5 – 13,5 × 10–3 |
1.4.6.
37. BAT is to reduce emissions from downstream processes by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (81) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable for the treatment of waste gases from the forming process (application of the coating to the fibres) or secondary processes which involve the use of binder that must be cured or dried |
||
|
|||
|
The technique is generally applicable for the treatment of waste gases from cutting and milling operations of the products |
Table 27
BAT-AELs for air emissions from downstream processes in the continuous filament glass fibre sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Emissions from forming and coating |
|
Dust |
< 5 – 20 |
Formaldehyde |
< 10 |
Ammonia |
< 30 |
Total volatile organic compounds, expressed as C |
< 20 |
Emissions from cutting and milling |
|
Dust |
< 5 – 20 |
1.5. BAT conclusions for domestic glass manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all domestic glass manufacturing installations.
1.5.1.
38. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (82) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the type of glass produced and the availability of substitute raw materials |
||
|
Not applicable for large volume glass productions (> 300 tonnes/day). Not applicable for productions requiring large pull variations The implementation requires a complete furnace rebuild |
||
|
The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications made at the time of a complete furnace rebuild |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
The applicability is limited to specific cases, in particular to electric melting furnaces, where flue-gas volumes and dust emissions are generally low and related to carryover of the batch formulation |
Table 28
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (83) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 (84) |
< 0,03 – 0,06 |
< 1 – 10 (85) |
< 0,003 – 0,03 |
1.5.2.
39. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (86) |
Applicability |
||||||
(i) Combustion modifications |
|||||||
|
Applicable to air/fuel conventional furnaces. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
Applicable only under installation-specific circumstances due to a lower furnace efficiency and higher fuel demand (i.e. use of recuperative furnaces in place of regenerative furnaces) |
||||||
|
Fuel staging is applicable to most conventional air/fuel furnaces. Air staging has very limited applicability due to its technical complexity |
||||||
|
The applicability of this technique is limited to the use of special burners with automatic recirculation of the waste gas |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable. The achieved environmental benefits are generally lower for applications to cross-fired, gas-fired furnaces due to technical constraints and a lower degree of flexibility of the furnace. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
The applicability is limited by the constraints associated with the availability of different types of fuel, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||||||
|
The applicability is limited to batch formulations that contain high levels of external cullet (> 70 %). The application requires a complete rebuild of the melting furnace. The shape of the furnace (long and narrow) may pose space restrictions |
||||||
|
Not applicable for large volume glass productions (> 300 tonnes/day). Not applicable for productions requiring large pull variations. The implementation requires a complete furnace rebuild |
||||||
|
The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications at the time of a complete furnace rebuild |
Table 29
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (87) |
||
NOx expressed as NO2 |
Combustion modifications, special furnace designs |
< 500 – 1 000 |
< 1,25 – 2,5 |
Electric melting |
< 100 |
< 0,3 |
|
Oxy-fuel melting (88) |
Not applicable |
< 0,5 – 1,5 |
40. When nitrates are used in the batch formulation, BAT is to reduce NOX emissions by minimising the use of these raw materials, in combination with primary or secondary techniques.
The BAT-AELs are set out in Table 29.
If nitrates are used in the batch formulation for a limited number of short campaigns or for melting furnaces with a capacity < 100 t/day producing special types of soda-lime glasses (clear/ultra-clear glass or coloured glass using selenium) and other special glasses (i.e. borosilicate, glass ceramics, opal glass, crystal and lead crystal), the BAT-AELs are set out in Table 30.
Technique (89) |
Applicability |
||
Primary techniques: |
|||
|
The substitution of nitrates in the batch formulation may be limited by the high costs and/or higher environmental impact of the alternative materials |
Table 30
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector, when nitrates are used in the batch formulation for a limited number of short campaigns or for melting furnaces with a capacity < 100 t/day producing special types of soda-lime glasses (clear/ultra-clear glass or coloured glass using selenium) and other special glasses (i.e. borosilicate, glass ceramics, opal glass, crystal and lead crystal
Parameter |
Type of furnace |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Fuel/air conventional furnaces |
< 500 – 1 500 |
< 1,25 – 3,75 (90) |
Electric melting |
< 300 – 500 |
< 8 – 10 |
1.5.3.
41. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (91) |
Applicability |
||
|
The minimisation of the sulphur content in the batch formulation is generally applicable within the constraints of quality requirements of the final glass product. The application of sulphur balance optimisation requires a trade-off approach between the removal of SOX emissions and the management of the solid waste (filter dust) |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 31
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector
Parameter |
Fuel/melting technique |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (92) |
||
SOx expressed as SO2 |
Natural gas |
< 200 – 300 |
< 0,5 – 0,75 |
Fuel oil (93) |
< 1 000 |
< 2,5 |
|
Electric melting |
< 100 |
< 0,25 |
1.5.4.
42. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (94) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints of the batch formulation for the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the quality requirements for the final product |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within technical constraints; i.e. need for a specific waste water treatment plant. High costs, waste water treatment aspects, including restrictions in the recycle of sludge or solid residues from the water treatment, may limit the applicability of this technique |
Table 32
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (95) |
|
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,03 – 0,06 |
|
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF (98) |
< 1 – 5 |
< 0,003 – 0,015 |
1.5.5.
43. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (99) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints imposed by the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
For the production of crystal and lead crystal glasses the minimisation of metal compounds in the batch formulation is restricted by the limits defined in Directive 69/493/EEC which classifies the chemical composition of the final glass products. |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 33
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector with the exception of glasses where selenium is used for decolourising
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (100) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (101) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 0,2 – 1 |
< 0,6 – 3 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 1 – 5 |
< 3 – 15 × 10–3 |
44. When selenium compounds are used for decolourising the glass, BAT is to reduce selenium emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques
Technique (102) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints imposed by the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 34
BAT-AELs for selenium emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector when selenium compounds are used for decolourising the glass
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (103) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (104) |
|
Selenium compounds, as Se |
< 1 |
< 3 × 10–3 |
45. When lead compounds are used for the manufacturing of lead crystal glass, BAT is to reduce lead emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (105) |
Applicability |
||
|
Not applicable for large volume glass productions (> 300 tonnes/day). Not applicable for productions requiring large pull variations. The implementation requires a complete furnace rebuild |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
|||
|
Table 35
BAT-AELs for lead emissions from the melting furnace in the domestic glass sector when lead compounds are used for manufacturing lead crystal glass
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (106) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (107) |
|
Lead compounds, expressed as Pb |
< 0,5 – 1 |
< 1 – 3 × 10–3 |
1.5.6.
46. For downstream dusty processes, BAT is to reduce emissions of dust and metals by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (108) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 36
BAT-AELs for air emissions from dusty downstream processes in the domestic glass sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Dust |
< 1 – 10 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) (109) |
< 1 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) (109) |
< 1 – 5 |
Lead compounds, expressed as Pb (110) |
< 1 – 1,5 |
47. For acid polishing processes, BAT is to reduce HF emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (111) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 37
BAT-AELs for HF emissions from acid polishing processes in the domestic glass sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 5 |
1.6. BAT conclusions for special glass manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all special glass manufacturing installations.
1.6.1.
48. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (112) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the quality of the glass produced |
||
|
Not applicable for large volume glass productions (> 300 tonnes/day) Not applicable for productions requiring large pull variations The implementation requires a complete furnace rebuild |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 38
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the special glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (113) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,03 – 0,13 |
< 1 – 10 (114) |
< 0,003 – 0,065 |
1.6.2.
49. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
I. |
primary techniques, such as:
|
II. |
secondary techniques, such as:
|
Table 39
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the special glass sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (117) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Combustion modifications |
600 – 800 |
1,5 – 3,2 |
Electric melting |
< 100 |
< 0,25 – 0,4 |
|
Not applicable |
< 1 – 3 |
||
Secondary techniques |
< 500 |
< 1 – 3 |
50. When nitrates are used in the batch formulation, BAT is to reduce NOX emissions by minimising the use of these raw materials, in combination with either primary or secondary techniques
Technique (120) |
Applicability |
||
Primary techniques |
|||
|
The substitution of nitrates in the batch formulation may be limited by the high costs and/or higher environmental impact of the alternative materials |
Table 40
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the special glass sector when nitrates are used in the batch formulation
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL (121) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (122) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Minimisation of nitrate input in the batch formulation combined with primary or secondary techniques |
< 500 – 1 000 |
< 1 – 6 |
1.6.3.
51. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (123) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of quality requirements of the final glass product |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 41
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the special glass sector
Parameter |
Fuel/melting technique |
BAT-AEL (124) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (125) |
||
SOX expressed as SO2 |
Natural gas, electric melting (126) |
< 30 – 200 |
< 0,08 – 0,5 |
Fuel oil (127) |
500 – 800 |
1,25 – 2 |
1.6.4.
52. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (128) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints of the batch formulation for the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the quality requirements for the final product. |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 42
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the special glass sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (129) |
|
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl (130) |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,03 – 0,05 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 1 – 5 |
< 0,003 – 0,04 (131) |
1.6.5.
53. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (132) |
Applicability |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints imposed by the type of glass produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 43
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the special glass sector
Parameter |
||
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (135) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 0,1 – 1 |
< 0,3 – 3 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 1 – 5 |
< 3 – 15 × 10–3 |
1.6.6.
54. For downstream dusty processes, BAT is to reduce emissions of dust and metals by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (136) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 44
BAT-AELs for dust and metal emissions from downstream processes in the special glass sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Dust |
1 – 10 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) (137) |
< 1 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) (137) |
< 1 – 5 |
55. For acid polishing processes, BAT is to reduce HF emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (138) |
Description |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 45
BAT-AELs for HF emissions from acid polishing processes in the special glass sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 5 |
1.7. BAT conclusions for mineral wool manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all mineral wool manufacturing installations.
1.7.1.
56. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by applying an electrostatic precipitator or a bag filter system
Technique (139) |
Applicability |
Filtration system: electrostatic precipitator or bag filter |
The technique is generally applicable. Electrostatic precipitators are not applicable to cupola furnaces for stone wool production, due to the risk of explosion from the ignition of carbon monoxide produced within the furnace |
Table 46
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the mineral wool sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (140) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,02 – 0,050 |
1.7.2.
57. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (141) |
Applicability |
||||||
(i) Combustion modifications |
|||||||
|
Applicable to air/fuel conventional furnaces. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
Applicable only under installation-specific circumstances due to a lower furnace efficiency and higher fuel demand (i.e. use of recuperative furnaces in place of regenerative furnaces) |
||||||
|
Fuel staging is applicable to most conventional air/fuel furnaces. Air staging has very limited applicability due to the technical complexity |
||||||
|
The applicability of this technique is limited to the use of special burners with automatic recirculation of the waste gas |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable. The achieved environmental benefits are generally lower for applications to cross-fired, gas-fired furnaces due to technical constraints and a lower degree of flexibility of the furnace. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
The applicability is limited by the constraints associated with the availability of different types of fuel, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||||||
|
Not applicable for large volume glass productions (> 300 tonnes/day). Not applicable for productions requiring large pull variations. The implementation requires a complete furnace rebuild |
||||||
|
The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications at the time of a complete furnace rebuild |
Table 47
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the mineral wool sector
Parameter |
Product |
Melting technique |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (142) |
|||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Glass wool |
Fuel/air and electric furnaces |
< 200 – 500 |
< 0,4 – 1,0 |
Oxy-fuel melting (143) |
Not applicable |
< 0,5 |
||
Stone wool |
All types of furnaces |
< 400 – 500 |
< 1,0 – 1,25 |
58. When nitrates are used in the batch formulation for glass wool production, BAT is to reduce NOX emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (144) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the quality requirements for the final product |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable. The implementation of electric melting requires a complete furnace rebuild |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable. The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications made at the time of a complete furnace rebuild |
Table 48
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in glass wool production when nitrates are used in the batch formulation
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (145) |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Minimisation of nitrate input in the batch formulation, combined with primary techniques |
< 500 – 700 |
< 1,0 – 1,4 (146) |
1.7.3.
59. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (147) |
Applicability |
||
|
In glass wool production, the technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the availability of low-sulphur raw materials, in particular external cullet. High levels of external cullet in the batch formulation limit the possibility of optimising the sulphur balance due to a variable sulphur content. In the stone wool production, the optimisation of the sulphur balance may require a trade-off approach between the removal of SOX emissions from the flue-gases and the management of the solid waste, deriving from the treatment of the flue-gases (filter dust) and/or from the fiberising process, which may be recycled into the batch formulation (cement briquettes) or may need to be disposed of |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||
|
Electrostatic precipitators are not applicable to cupola furnaces for stone wool production (see BAT 56) |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within technical constraints; i.e. need for a specific waste water treatment plant |
Table 49
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the mineral wool sector
Parameter |
Product/conditions |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (148) |
||
SOX expressed as SO2 |
Glass wool |
||
Gas-fired and electric furnaces (149) |
< 50 – 150 |
< 0,1 – 0,3 |
|
Stone wool |
|||
Gas-fired and electric furnaces |
< 350 |
< 0,9 |
|
Cupola furnaces, no briquettes or slag recycling (150) |
< 400 |
< 1,0 |
|
Cupola furnaces, with cement briquettes or slag recycling (151) |
< 1 400 |
< 3,5 |
1.7.4.
60. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (152) |
Description |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the batch formulation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
Electrostatic precipitators are not applicable to cupola furnaces for stone wool production (see BAT 56) |
Table 50
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the mineral wool sector
Parameter |
Product |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (153) |
||
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl |
Glass wool |
< 5 – 10 |
< 0,01 – 0,02 |
Stone wool |
< 10 – 30 |
< 0,025 – 0,075 |
|
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
All products |
< 1 – 5 |
< 0,002 – 0,013 (154) |
1.7.5.
61. BAT is to reduce H2S emissions from the melting furnace by applying a waste gas incineration system to oxidise hydrogen sulphide to SO2
Technique (155) |
Applicability |
Waste gas incinerator system |
The technique is generally applicable to stone wool cupola furnaces |
Table 51
BAT-AELs for H2S emissions from the melting furnace in stone wool production
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (156) |
|
Hydrogen sulphide, expressed as H2S |
< 2 |
< 0,005 |
1.7.6.
62. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (157) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the availability of raw materials. In glass wool production, the use of manganese in the batch formulation as an oxidising agent depends on the quantity and quality of external cullet employed in the batch formulation and may be minimised accordingly |
||
|
Electrostatic precipitators are not applicable to cupola furnaces for stone wool production (see BAT 56) |
Table 52
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the mineral wool sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (158) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (159) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 0,2 – 1 (160) |
< 0,4 – 2,5 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 1 – 2 (160) |
< 2 – 5 × 10–3 |
1.7.7.
63. BAT is to reduce emissions from downstream processes by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (161) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable to the mineral wool sector, in particular to glass wool processes for the treatment of emissions from the forming area (application of the coating to the fibres). Limited applicability to stone wool processes since it could adversely affect other abatement techniques being used. |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable for the treatment of waste gases from the forming process (application of the coating to the fibres) or for combined waste gases (forming plus curing) |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable for the treatment of waste gases from the forming process (application of the coating to the fibres), from curing ovens or for combined waste gases (forming plus curing) |
||
|
The applicability is mainly limited to stone wool processes for waste gases from the forming area and/or curing ovens |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable for the treatment of waste gases from curing ovens, in particular in the stone wool processes. The application to combined waste gases (forming plus curing) is not economically viable because of the high volume, low concentration, low temperature of the waste gases |
Table 53
BAT-AELs for air emissions from downstream processes in the mineral wool sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne finished product |
|
Forming area – Combined forming and curing emissions-Combined forming, curing and cooling emissions |
||
Total particulate matter |
< 20 – 50 |
— |
Phenol |
< 5 – 10 |
— |
Formaldehyde |
< 2 – 5 |
— |
Ammonia |
30 – 60 |
— |
Amines |
< 3 |
— |
Total volatile organic compounds expressed as C |
10 – 30 |
— |
Total particulate matter |
< 5 – 30 |
< 0,2 |
Phenol |
< 2 – 5 |
< 0,03 |
Formaldehyde |
< 2 – 5 |
< 0,03 |
Ammonia |
< 20 – 60 |
< 0,4 |
Amines |
< 2 |
< 0,01 |
Total volatile organic compounds expressed as C |
< 10 |
< 0,065 |
NOX, expressed as NO2 |
< 100 – 200 |
< 1 |
1.8. BAT conclusions for high temperature insulation wools (HTIW) manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all HTIW manufacturing installations.
1.8.1.
64. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by applying a filtration system.
Technique (164) |
Applicability |
The filtration system usually consists of a bag filter |
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 54
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the HTIW sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
||
Dust |
Flue-gas cleaning by filtration systems |
< 5 – 20 (165) |
65. For downstream dusty processes, BAT is to reduce emissions using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (166) |
Applicability |
||||||||||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Table 55
BAT-AELs from dusty downstream processes in the HTIW sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Dust (167) |
1 – 5 |
1.8.2.
66. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the lubricant burn-off oven by applying combustion control and/or modifications
Technique |
Applicability |
||||||
Combustion control and/or modifications Techniques to reduce the formation of thermal NOX emissions include a control of the main combustion parameters:
A good combustion control consists of generating those conditions which are least favourable for NOX formation |
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 56
BAT-AELs for NOX from the lubricant burn-off oven in the HTIW sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Combustion control and/or modifications |
100 – 200 |
1.8.3.
67. BAT is to reduce SOX emissions from the melting furnaces and downstream processes by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (168) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
Table 57
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnaces and downstream processes in the HTIW sector
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
||
SOx expressed as SO2 |
Primary techniques |
< 50 |
1.8.4.
68. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by selecting raw materials for the batch formulation with a low content of chlorine and fluorine
Technique (169) |
Applicability |
Selection of raw materials for the batch formulation with a low content of chlorine and fluorine |
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 58
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the HTIW sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl |
< 10 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 5 |
1.8.5.
69. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace and/or downstream processes by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (170) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 59
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace and/or downstream processes in the HTIW sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (171) |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 1 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 5 |
1.8.6.
70. BAT is to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the lubricant burn-off oven by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (172) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
The economic viability may limit the applicability of these techniques because of low waste gas volumes and VOC concentrations |
||
|
Table 60
BAT-AELs for VOC emissions from the lubricant burn-off oven in the HTIW sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
||
Volatile organic compounds expressed as C |
Primary and/or secondary techniques |
10 – 20 |
1.9. BAT conclusions for frits manufacturing
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section can be applied to all frits glass manufacturing installations.
1.9.1.
71. BAT is to reduce dust emissions from the waste gases of the melting furnace by means of an electrostatic precipitator or a bag filter system.
Technique (173) |
Applicability |
Filtration system: electrostatic precipitator or bag filter |
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 61
BAT-AELs for dust emissions from the melting furnace in the frits sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (174) |
|
Dust |
< 10 – 20 |
< 0,05 – 0,15 |
1.9.2.
72. BAT is to reduce NOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (175) |
Applicability |
||||||
|
The substitution of nitrates in the batch formulation may be limited by the high costs and/or higher environmental impact of the alternative materials and/or the quality requirements of the final product |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||||||
(iii) Combustion modifications |
|||||||
|
Applicable to air/fuel conventional furnaces. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
Applicable only under installation-specific circumstances due to a lower furnace efficiency and higher fuel demand |
||||||
|
Fuel staging is applicable to most conventional air/fuel furnaces. Air staging has very limited applicability due to its technical complexity |
||||||
|
The applicability of this technique is limited to the use of special burners with automatic recirculation of the waste gas |
||||||
|
The technique is generally applicable. Full benefits are achieved at normal or complete furnace rebuild, when combined with optimum furnace design and geometry |
||||||
|
The applicability is limited by the constraints associated with the availability of different types of fuel, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
||||||
|
The maximum environmental benefits are achieved for applications at the time of a complete furnace rebuild |
Table 62
BAT-AELs for NOX emissions from the melting furnace in the frits glass sector
Parameter |
BAT |
Operating conditions |
BAT-AEL (176) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (177) |
|||
NOX expressed as NO2 |
Primary techniques |
Oxy-fuel firing, without nitrates (178) |
Not applicable |
< 2,5 – 5 |
Oxy-fuel firing, with use of nitrates |
Not applicable |
5 – 10 |
||
Fuel/air, fuel/oxygen-enriched air combustion, without nitrates |
500 – 1 000 |
2,5 – 7,5 |
||
Fuel/air, fuel/oxygen-enriched air combustion, with use of nitrates |
< 1 600 |
< 12 |
1.9.3.
73. BAT is to control SOX emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (179) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
||
|
The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State |
Table 63
BAT-AELs for SOX emissions from the melting furnace in the frits sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (180) |
|
SOX, expressed as SO2 |
< 50 – 200 |
< 0,25 – 1,5 |
1.9.4.
74. BAT is to reduce HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (181) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the batch formulation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The minimisation or substitution of fluorine compounds with alternative materials is limited by quality requirements of the product |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable |
Table 64
BAT-AELs for HCl and HF emissions from the melting furnace in the frits sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (182) |
|
Hydrogen chloride, expressed as HCl |
< 10 |
< 0,05 |
Hydrogen fluoride, expressed as HF |
< 5 |
< 0,03 |
1.9.5.
75. BAT is to reduce metal emissions from the melting furnace by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (183) |
Applicability |
||
|
The technique is generally applicable within the constraints of the type of frit produced at the installation and the availability of raw materials |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
Table 65
BAT-AELs for metal emissions from the melting furnace in the frits sector
Parameter |
BAT-AEL (184) |
|
mg/Nm3 |
kg/tonne melted glass (185) |
|
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 1 |
< 7,5 × 10–3 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 5 |
< 37 × 10–3 |
1.9.6.
76. For downstream dusty processes, BAT is to reduce emissions by using one or a combination of the following techniques:
Technique (186) |
Applicability |
||
|
The techniques are generally applicable |
||
|
|||
|
Table 66
BAT-AELs for air emissions from downstream processes in the frits sector, when treated separately
Parameter |
BAT-AEL |
mg/Nm3 |
|
Dust |
5 – 10 |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI) |
< 1 (187) |
Σ (As, Co, Ni, Cd, Se, CrVI, Sb, Pb, CrIII, Cu, Mn, V, Sn) |
< 5 (187) |
Glossary
1.10. Description of techniques
1.10.1.
Technique |
Description |
Electrostatic precipitator |
Electrostatic precipitators operate such that particles are charged and separated under the influence of an electrical field. Electrostatic precipitators are capable of operating over a wide range of conditions |
Bag filter |
Bag filters are constructed from porous woven or felted fabric through which gases are flowed to remove particles. The use of a bag filter requires a fabric material selection adequate to the characteristics of the waste gases and the maximum operating temperature |
Reduction of the volatile components by raw material modifications |
The formulation of batch compositions might contain very volatile components (e.g. boron compounds) which could be minimised or substituted for reducing dust emissions mainly generated by volatilisation phenomena |
Electric melting |
The technique consists of a melting furnace where the energy is provided by resistive heating. In the cold-top furnaces (where the electrodes are generally inserted at the bottom of the furnace) the batch blanket covers the surface of the melt with a consequent, significant reduction of the volatilisation of batch components (i.e. lead compounds) |
1.10.2.
Technique |
Description |
||||||||
Combustion modifications |
|||||||||
|
The technique is mainly based on the following features:
|
||||||||
|
The use of recuperative furnaces, in place of regenerative furnaces, results in a reduced air preheat temperature and, consequently, a lower flame temperature. However, this is associated with a lower furnace efficiency (lower specific pull), lower fuel efficiency and higher fuel demand, resulting in potentially higher emissions (kg/tonne of glass) |
||||||||
|
— Air staging– involves substoichiometric firing and the addition of the remaining air or oxygen into the furnace to complete combustion. — Fuel staging– a low impulse primary flame is developed in the port neck (10 % of total energy); a secondary flame covers the root of the primary flame reducing its core temperature |
||||||||
|
Implies the reinjection of waste gas from the furnace into the flame to reduce the oxygen content and therefore the temperature of the flame. The use of special burners is based on internal recirculation of combustion gases which cool the root of the flames and reduce the oxygen content in the hottest part of the flames |
||||||||
|
The technique is based on the principles of reducing peak flame temperatures, delaying but completing the combustion and increasing the heat transfer (increased emissivity of the flame). It may be associated with a modified design of the furnace combustion chamber |
||||||||
|
In general, oil-fired furnaces show lower NOX emissions than gas-fired furnaces due to better thermal emissivity and lower flame temperatures |
||||||||
Special furnace design |
Recuperative type furnace that integrates various features, allowing for lower flame temperatures. The main features are:
|
||||||||
Electric melting |
The technique consists of a melting furnace where the energy is provided by resistive heating. The main features are:
|
||||||||
Oxy-fuel melting |
The technique involves the replacement of the combustion air with oxygen (> 90 % purity), with consequent elimination/reduction of thermal NOX formation from nitrogen entering the furnace. The residual nitrogen content in the furnace depends on the purity of the oxygen supplied, on the quality of the fuel (% N2 in natural gas) and on the potential air inlet |
||||||||
Chemical reduction by fuel |
The technique is based on the injection of fossil fuel to the waste gas with chemical reduction of NOX to N2 through a series of reactions. In the 3R process, the fuel (natural gas or oil) is injected at the regenerator entrance. The technology is designed for use in regenerative furnaces |
||||||||
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) |
The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen in a catalytic bed by reaction with ammonia (in general aqueous solution) at an optimum operating temperature of around 300 – 450 °C. One or two layers of catalyst may be applied. A higher NOX reduction is achieved with the use of higher amounts of catalyst (two layers) |
||||||||
Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) |
The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen by reaction with ammonia or urea at a high temperature. The operating temperature window must be maintained between 900 and 1 050 °C |
||||||||
Minimising the use of nitrates in the batch formulation |
The minimisation of nitrates is used to reduce NOX emissions deriving from the decomposition of these raw materials when applied as an oxidising agent for very high quality products where a very colourless (clear) glass is required or for other glasses to provide the required characteristics. The following options may be applied:
|
1.10.3.
Technique |
Description |
Dry or semi-dry scrubbing, in combination with a filtration system |
Dry powder or a suspension/solution of alkaline reagent are introduced and dispersed in the waste gas stream. The material reacts with the sulphur gaseous species to form a solid which has to be removed by filtration (bag filter or electrostatic precipitator). In general, the use of a reaction tower improves the removal efficiency of the scrubbing system |
Minimisation of the sulphur content in the batch formulation and optimisation of the sulphur balance |
The minimisation of sulphur content in the batch formulation is applied to reduce SOX emissions deriving from the decomposition of sulphur-containing raw materials (in general, sulphates) used as fining agents. The effective reduction of SOX emissions depends on the retention of sulphur compounds in the glass, which may vary significantly depending on the glass type, and on the optimisation of the sulphur balance |
Use of low sulphur content fuels |
The use of natural gas or low sulphur fuel oil is applied to reduce the amount of SOX emissions deriving from the oxidation of sulphur contained in the fuel during combustion |
1.10.4.
Technique |
Description |
Selection of raw materials for the batch formulation with a low content of chlorine and fluorine |
The technique consists of a careful selection of raw materials that may contain chlorides and fluorides as impurities (e.g. synthetic soda ash, dolomite, external cullet, recycled filter dust) in order to reduce at source HCl and HF emissions which arise from the decomposition of these materials during the melting process |
Minimisation of the fluorine and/or chlorine compounds in the batch formulation and optimisation of the fluorine and/or chlorine mass balance |
The minimisation of fluorine and/or chlorine emissions from the melting process may be achieved by minimising/reducing the quantity of these substances used in the batch formulation to the minimum commensurate with the quality of the final product. Fluorine compounds (e.g. fluorspar, cryolite, fluorsilicate) are used to confer particular characteristics to special glasses (e.g. opaque glass, optical glass). Chlorine compounds may be used as fining agents |
Dry or semi-dry scrubbing, in combination with a filtration system |
Dry powder or a suspension/solution of alkaline reagent are introduced and dispersed in the waste gas stream. The material reacts with the gaseous chlorides and fluorides to form a solid which has to be removed by filtration (electrostatic precipitator or bag filter) |
1.10.5.
Technique |
Description |
||||
Selection of raw materials for the batch formulation with a low content of metals |
The technique consists of a careful selection of batch materials that may contain metals as impurities (e.g. external cullet), in order to reduce at source metal emissions which arise from the decomposition of these materials during the melting process |
||||
Minimising the use of metal compounds in the batch formulation, where colouring and decolourising of glass is needed, subject to consumer glass quality requirements |
The minimisation of metal emissions from the melting process may be achieved as follows:
|
||||
Minimising the use of selenium compounds in the batch formulation, through a suitable selection of the raw materials |
The minimisation of selenium emissions from the melting process may be achieved by:
|
||||
Application of a filtration system |
Dust abatement systems (bag filter and electrostatic precipitator) can reduce both dust and metal emissions since the emissions to air of metals from glass melting processes are largely contained in particulate form. However, for some metals presenting extremely volatile compounds (e.g. selenium) the removal efficiency may vary significantly with the filtration temperature |
||||
Dry or semi-dry scrubbing, in combination with a filtration system |
Gaseous metals can be substantially reduced by the use of a dry or semi-dry scrubbing technique with an alkaline reagent. The alkaline reagent reacts with the gaseous species to form a solid which has to be removed by filtration (bag filter or electrostatic precipitator) |
1.10.6.
Wet scrubbing |
In the wet scrubbing process, gaseous compounds are dissolved in a suitable liquid (water or alkaline solution). Downstream of the wet scrubber, the flue-gases are saturated with water and a separation of the droplets is required before discharging the flue-gases. The resulting liquid has to be treated by a waste water process and the insoluble matter is collected by sedimentation or filtration |
1.10.7.
Technique |
Description |
||||
Wet scrubbing |
In a wet scrubbing process (by a suitable liquid: water or alkaline solution), the simultaneous removal of solid and gaseous compounds may be achieved. The design criteria for particulate or gas removal are different; therefore, the design is often a compromise between the two options. The resulting liquid has to be treated by a waste water process and the insoluble matter (solid emissions and products from chemical reactions) is collected by sedimentation or filtration. In the mineral wool and continuous filament glass fibre sector, the most common systems applied are:
|
||||
Wet electrostatic precipitator |
The technique consists of an electrostatic precipitator in which the collected material is removed from the plates of the collectors by flushing with a suitable liquid, usually water. Some mechanism is usually installed to remove water droplets before discharge of the waste gas (demister or a last dry field) |
1.10.8.
Technique |
Description |
Performing dusty operations (e.g. cutting, grinding, polishing) under liquid |
Water is generally used as a coolant for cutting, grinding and polishing operations and for preventing dust emissions. An extraction system equipped with a mist eliminator may be necessary |
Applying a bag filter system |
The use of bag filters is suitable for the reduction of both dust and metal emissions since metals from downstream processes are largely contained in particulate form |
Minimising the losses of polishing product by ensuring a good sealing of the application system |
Acid polishing is performed by immersion of the glass articles in a polishing bath of hydrofluoric and sulphuric acids. The release of fumes may be minimised by a good design and maintenance of the application system in order to minimise losses |
Applying a secondary technique, e.g. wet scrubbing |
Wet scrubbing with water is used for the treatment of waste gases, due to the acidic nature of the emissions and the high solubility of the gaseous pollutants to be removed |
1.10.9.
Waste gas incineration |
The technique consists of an afterburner system which oxidises the hydrogen sulphide (generated by strong reducing conditions in the melting furnace) to sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide. Volatile organic compounds are thermally incinerated with consequent oxidation to carbon dioxide, water and other combustion products (e.g. NOX, SOX) |
(1) Specific cases correspond to less favourable cases (i.e. small special furnaces with a production of generally below 100 tonnes/day and a cullet rate of below 30 %). This category represents only 1 or 2 % of the container glass production.
(2) Specific cases corresponding to less favourable cases and/or non-soda-lime glasses: borosilicates, glass ceramic, crystal glass and, less frequently, lead crystal glass.
(3) The higher levels are associated with higher inlet NOX concentrations, higher reduction rates and the ageing of the catalyst.
(4) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.1, 1.10.4 and 1.10.6.
(5) The relevance of the pollutants listed in the table depends on the sector of the glass industry and on the different activities carried out at the plant.
(6) The levels refer to a composite sample taken over a time period of 2 hours or 24 hours.
(7) For the continuous filament glass fibre sector, BAT-AEL is < 200 mg/l.
(8) The level refers to treated water coming from activities involving acid polishing.
(9) In general, total hydrocarbons are composed of mineral oils.
(10) The higher level of the range is associated with downstream processes for the production of lead crystal glass.
(11) A description of filtration systems (i.e. electrostatic precipitator, bag filter) is given in Section 1.10.1.
(12) The conversion factors of 1,5 × 10–3 and 3 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and higher value of the range respectively.
(13) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(14) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(15) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 for general cases (1,5 × 10–3) has been applied, with the exception of electric melting (specific cases: 3 × 10–3).
(16) The lower value refers to the use of special furnace designs, where applicable.
(17) These values should be reconsidered in the occasion of a normal or complete rebuild of the melting furnace.
(18) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(19) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(20) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 for specific cases (3 × 10–3) has been applied.
(21) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.3.
(22) For special types of coloured glasses (e.g. reduced green glasses), concerns related to the achievable emission levels may require investigating the sulphur balance. Values reported in the table may be difficult to achieve in combination with filter dust recycling and the rate of recycling of external cullet.
(23) The lower levels are associated with conditions where the reduction of SOX is a high priority over a lower production of solid waste corresponding to the sulphate-rich filter dust.
(24) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 for general cases (1,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(25) The associated emission levels are related to the use of 1 % sulphur fuel oil in combination with secondary abatement techniques.
(26) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.4.
(27) The conversion factor for general cases, reported in Table 2 (1,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(28) The higher levels are associated with the simultaneous treatment of flue-gases from hot-end coating operations.
(29) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(30) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(31) The lower levels are BAT-AELs when metal compounds are not intentionally used in the batch formulation.
(32) The upper levels are associated with the use of metals for colouring or decolourising the glass, or when the flue-gases from the hot-end coating operations are treated together with the melting furnace emissions.
(33) The conversion factor for general cases, reported in Table 2 (1,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(34) In specific cases, when high quality flint glass is produced requiring higher amounts of selenium for decolourising (depending on the raw materials), higher values are reported, up to 3 mg/Nm3.
(35) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.4 and 1.10.7.
(36) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.6.
(37) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(38) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(39) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(40) Higher emission levels are expected when nitrates are used occasionally for the production of special glasses.
(41) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(42) The lower levels of the range are associated with the application of the Fenix process.
(43) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(44) The higher levels of the range are associated with existing plants until a normal or complete rebuild of the melting furnace. The lower levels are associated with newer/retrofitted plants.
(45) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.2.
(46) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 for specific cases (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied
(47) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.3.
(48) The lower levels are associated with conditions where the reduction of SOX has a high priority over a lower production of solid waste corresponding to the sulphate-rich filter dust.
(49) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(50) The associated emission levels are related to the use of 1 % sulphur fuel oil in combination with secondary abatement techniques.
(51) For large flat glass furnaces, concerns related to the achievable emission levels may require investigating the sulphur balance. Values reported in the table may be difficult to achieve in combination with filter dust recycling.
(52) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.4.
(53) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(54) The higher levels of the range are associated with the recycling of filter dust in the batch formulation
(55) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(56) The ranges refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(57) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied
(58) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(59) The values refer to the sum of selenium present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(60) The lower levels correspond to conditions where the reduction of Se emissions is a priority over a lower production of solid waste from filter dust. In this case, a high stoichiometric ratio (reagent/pollutant) is applied and a significant solid waste stream is generated.
(61) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(62) A description of the secondary treatment systems is given in Sections 1.10.3 and 1.10.6.
(63) A description of the secondary treatment systems is given in Sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.7.
(64) Values at levels of < 30 mg/Nm3 (< 0,14 kg/tonne melted glass) have been reported for boron-free formulations, with the application of primary techniques.
(65) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (4,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(66) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(67) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (4,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(68) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(69) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.3 and 1.10.6.
(70) The higher levels of the range are associated with the use of sulphates in the batch formulation for refining the glass.
(71) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (4,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(72) For oxy-fuel furnaces with the application of wet scrubbing, the BAT-AEL is reported to be < 0,1 kg/tonne melted glass of SOX, expressed as SO2.
(73) The associated emission levels are related to the use of 1 % sulphur fuel oil in combination with secondary abatement techniques.
(74) The lower levels correspond to conditions where the reduction of SOX is a priority over a lower production of solid waste corresponding to the sulphate-rich filter dust. In this case, the lower levels are associated with the use of a bag filter.
(75) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.4 and 1.10.6.
(76) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (4,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(77) The higher levels of the range are associated with the use of fluorine compounds in the batch formulation.
(78) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.5 and 1.10.6.
(79) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(80) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 (4,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(81) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.7 and 1.10.8.
(82) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.5 and 1.10.7.
(83) A conversion factor of 3 × 10–3 has been applied (see Table 2). However, a case by case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(84) Considerations concerning the economic viability for achieving the BAT-AELs in the case of furnaces with a capacity of < 80 t/d, producing soda-lime glass, are reported.
(85) This BAT-AEL applies to batch formulations containing significant amounts of constituents meeting the criteria as dangerous substances, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(86) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(87) A conversion factor of 2,5 × 10–3 has been applied for combustion modifications and special furnace designs and a conversion factor of 3 × 10–3 has been applied for electric melting (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(88) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(89) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.2.
(90) The conversion factor reported in Table 2 for soda-lime glass (2,5 × 10–3) has been applied.
(91) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.3.
(92) A conversion factor of 2,5 × 10–3 has been applied (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(93) The levels are related to the use of 1 % sulphur fuel oil in combination with secondary abatement techniques.
(94) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.4 and 1.10.6.
(95) A conversion factor of 3 × 10–3 has been applied (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(96) The lower levels are associated with the use of electric melting.
(97) In cases where KCl or NaCl are used as a refining agents, the BAT-AEL is < 30 mg/Nm3 or < 0,09 kg/tonne melted glass.
(98) The lower levels are associated with the use of electric melting. The higher levels are associated with the production of opal glass, the recycling of filter dust or where high levels of external cullet are used in the batch formulation.
(99) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(100) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(101) A conversion factor of 3 × 10–3 has been applied (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(102) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(103) The values refer to the sum of selenium present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(104) A conversion factor of 3 × 10–3 has been applied (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(105) A description of the technique is given in Sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.5.
(106) The values refer to the sum of lead present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(107) A conversion factor of 3 × 10–3 has been applied (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied for specific productions.
(108) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.8.
(109) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the waste gas.
(110) The levels refer to downstream operations on lead crystal glass.
(111) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.6.
(112) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.1.
(113) The conversions factors of 2,5 × 10–3 and 6,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper value of the BAT-AELs range (see Table 2), with some values being approximated. However, a-case-by-case conversion factor needs to be applied, depending on the type of glass produced (see Table 2).
(114) The BAT-AELs apply to batch formulations containing significant amounts of constituents meeting the criteria as dangerous substances, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
(115) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(116) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(117) The conversion factors of 2,5 × 10–3 and 4 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper value of the BAT-AEL range (see Table 2), with some values being approximated. However, a case-by-case conversion factor needs to be applied based on the type of production (see Table 2).
(118) The higher values are related to a special production of borosilicate glass tubes for pharmaceutical use.
(119) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(120) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.2.
(121) The lower levels are associated with the use of electric melting.
(122) The conversion factors of 2,5 × 10–3 and 6,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper value of the BAT-AEL range respectively, with values being approximated. A case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of production (see Table 2).
(123) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.3.
(124) The ranges take into account the variable sulphur balances associated with the type of glass produced.
(125) The conversion factor of 2,5 × 10–3 (see Table 2) has been used. However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of production.
(126) The lower levels are associated with the use of electric melting and batch formulations without sulphates.
(127) The associated emission levels are related to the use of 1 % sulphur fuel oil in combination with secondary abatement techniques.
(128) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.4.
(129) The conversion factor of 2,5 × 10–3 (see Table 2) has been used; with some values being approximated. A case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of production.
(130) The higher levels are associated with the use of materials containing chlorine in the batch formulation.
(131) The upper value of the range has been derived from specific reported data.
(132) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(133) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(134) The lower levels are BAT-AELs when metal compounds are not intentionally used in the batch formulation.
(135) The conversion factor of 2,5 × 10–3 (see Table 2) has been used, with some values indicated in the table having been approximated. A case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of production.
(136) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.8.
(137) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the waste gas.
(138) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.6.
(139) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.1.
(140) The conversion factors of 2 × 10–3 and 2,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper value of the BAT-AELs range (see Table 2), in order to cover both the production of glass wool and stone wool.
(141) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(142) The conversion factors of 2 × 10–3 for glass wool and 2,5 × 10–3 for stone wool have been used (see Table 2).
(143) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(144) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.2.
(145) The conversion factor of 2 × 10–3 has been used (see Table 2).
(146) The lower levels of the ranges are associated with the application of oxy-fuel melting.
(147) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.3 and 1.10.6.
(148) The conversion factors of 2 × 10–3 for glass wool and 2,5 × 10–3 for stone wool have been used (see Table 2).
(149) The lower levels of the ranges are associated with the use of electric melting. The higher levels are associated with high levels of cullet recycling.
(150) The BAT-AEL is associated with conditions where the reduction of SOX emissions has a high priority over a lower production of solid waste.
(151) When reduction of waste has a high priority over SOX emissions, higher emission values may be expected. The achievable levels should be based on a sulphur balance.
(152) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.4.
(153) The conversion factors of 2 × 10–3 for glass wool and 2,5 × 10–3 for stone wool have been used (see Table 2).
(154) The conversion factors of 2 × 10–3 and 2,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper values of the BAT-AELs range (see Table 2).
(155) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.9.
(156) The conversion factor of 2,5 × 10–3 for stone wool has been applied (see Table 2).
(157) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(158) The ranges refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(159) The conversion factors of 2 × 10–3 and 2,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper values of the BAT-AELs range (see Table 2).
(160) Higher values are associated with the use of cupola furnaces for the production of stone wool.
(161) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.7 and 1.10.9.
(162) Emission levels expressed in kg/tonne of finished product are not affected by the thickness of the mineral wool mat produced nor by extreme concentration or dilution of the flue-gases. A conversion factor of 6,5 × 10–3 has been used.
(163) If high density or high binder content mineral wools are produced, the emission levels associated with the techniques listed as BAT for the sector could be significantly higher than these BAT-AELs. If these types of products represent the majority of the production from a given installation, then consideration should be given to other techniques.
(164) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.1.
(165) The values are associated with the use of a bag filter system.
(166) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.1.
(167) The lower level of the range is associated with emissions of aluminium silicate glass wool/refractory ceramic fibres (ASW/RCF).
(168) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.3.
(169) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.4.
(170) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.5.
(171) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(172) A description of the techniques is given in Sections 1.10.6 and 1.10.9.
(173) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.1.
(174) The conversion factors of 5 × 10–3 and 7,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and upper value of the BAT-AELs range (see Table 2). However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of combustion.
(175) A description of the technique is given in Section 1.10.2.
(176) The ranges take into account the combination of flue-gases from furnaces applying different melting techniques and producing a variety of frit types, with or without nitrates in the batch formulations, which may be conveyed to a single stack, precluding the possibility of characterising each applied melting technique and the different products.
(177) The conversion factors of 5 × 10–3 and 7,5 × 10–3 have been used for the determination of the lower and higher values of the range. However, a case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of combustion (see Table 2).
(178) The achievable levels depend on the quality of the natural gas and oxygen available (nitrogen content).
(179) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.3.
(180) The conversion factors of 5 × 10–3 and 7,5 × 10–3 have been used; however, the values indicated in the table may have been approximated. A case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of combustion (see Table 2).
(181) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.4.
(182) The conversion factor of 5 × 10–3 has been used with some values being approximated. A case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of combustion (see Table 2).
(183) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.5.
(184) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the flue-gases in both solid and gaseous phases.
(185) The conversion factor of 7,5 × 10–3 has been used. A case-by-case conversion factor may have to be applied based on the type of combustion (see Table 2).
(186) A description of the techniques is given in Section 1.10.1.
(187) The levels refer to the sum of metals present in the waste gas.