Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Search results

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Search Results

Domain: All, Subdomain: Case-law, Defendant: Institutions, Search language: English, Include case-law summaries: True
2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all

Case T-611/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma v EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera — Decision of the EMA not to validate the application for marketing authorisation — Previous decision of the Commission taking the view that Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm — Plea of illegality — Admissibility — Previously authorised combination medicinal product — Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product — Assessment of the existence of two different global marketing authorisations — Manifest error of assessment)

CELEX number:
62018TA0611
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
05/05/2021

Case T-561/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission (State aid — Postal sector — Compensation for the discharge of the universal service obligation — Decision not to raise any objections — Calculation of the compensation — Net avoided cost methodology — Taking into account the intangible benefits of the universal service — Use of funds granted as compensation — State guarantee of redundancy payments in the event of bankruptcy — VAT exemption for certain transactions carried out by the universal service provider — Accounting allocation of common costs between universal service activities and non-universal service activities — Capital contribution from a public undertaking in order to avoid the bankruptcy of its subsidiary — Complaint from a competitor — Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage — Existing aid — Advantages granted on a periodic basis — Whether imputable to the State — Private investor test)

CELEX number:
62018TA0561
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
05/05/2021

Case T-69/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Verband Deutscher Alten und Behindertenhilfe and CarePool Hannover v Commission (State aid — Independent social action — Subsidies granted to associations in a regional working group for charity action — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections at the end of the preliminary examination stage — Action for annulment — Status of interested party — Safeguarding of procedural rights — Substantial effect on competitive position — Admissibility — No serious difficulties — No substantial alteration to existing aid)

CELEX number:
62018TA0069
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
14/04/2021

Case T-584/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 –Primart v EUIPO — Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national word marks PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Referral)

CELEX number:
62017TA0584(01)
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
28/04/2021

Case T-843/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Correia v EESC (Civil service — EESC staff — Members of the temporary staff — Refusal to regrade — Action for annulment — Time limit for complaints — Burden of proving expiry of the time limit — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Action for damages — Non-material damage)

CELEX number:
62019TA0843
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
28/04/2021

Case T-29/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — RQ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Director-General of OLAF — Decision waiving the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Duty of assistance and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Legitimate expectations — Presumption of innocence — Principle of sound administration)

CELEX number:
62017TA0029(01)
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
14/04/2021

Case T-872/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — repowermap.org v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Freedom of expression)

CELEX number:
62016TA0872
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
28/04/2021

Case T-842/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Repower v EUIPO — repowermap.org (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

CELEX number:
62016TA0842
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
28/04/2021

Case C-26/21 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Dermavita Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-643/19, Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)

CELEX number:
62021CN0026
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
18/01/2021

Case C-5/21 P: Appeal brought on 6 January 2021 by Deutsche Post AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 November 2020 in Case T-25/20, Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn)

CELEX number:
62021CN0005
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
06/01/2021
2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all