Search Results

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 13 September 2018.
Georgios Pandalis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) and Article 75 — EU trade mark Cystus — Food supplements not for medical purposes — Partial revocation — Lack of genuine use of the trade mark — Perception of the word ‘cystus’ as a descriptive indication of the main ingredient of the goods concerned — Obligation to state reasons.
Case C-194/17 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:725

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 January 2018.
Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘медведь’ — Dismissal of application.
Case C-570/17 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:11

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2015.
Cantina Broglie 1 Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Community trade mark — Word mark ZENATO RIPASSA — Opposition from the proprietor of the national word mark RIPASSO — Likelihood of confusion — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b).
Case C-33/15 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:705

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2015.
Cantina Broglie 1 Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Community trade mark — Word mark ZENATO RIPASSA — Opposition from the proprietor of the national word mark RIPASSO — Likelihood of confusion — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b).
Case C-34/15 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:704

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 December 2014.
FTI Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Appeal — Community trade mark — Marque verbale BigXtra — Absolute ground for refusal of registration — No distinctive character.
Case C‑253/14 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:2445

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 October 2014.
Mundipharma GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Application for registration of word mark Maxigesic — Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier word mark OXYGESIC — Refusal of registration.
Case C‑669/13 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:2308

Case C-410/12 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2013 — medi GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Application for registration of the Community word mark medi — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Distortion of the evidence — None)

OJ C 377, 21/12/2013, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 377, 21/12/2013, p. 3–3