English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Search Results
Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 9 December 2021.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:994
- CELEX number:
- 62020CC0561
- Form:
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 09/12/2021
Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 20 October 2016.
Intel Corp. v European Commission.
Appeal — Article 102 TFEU — Abuse of a dominant position — Loyalty rebates –– Commission’s jurisdiction — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 19.
Case C-413/14 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2016:788
- CELEX number:
- 62014CC0413
- Form:
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 20/10/2016
Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 30 April 2015.
InnoLux Corp. v European Commission.
Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Worldwide market for liquid crystal display (LCD) panels — Price-fixing — Fines — Guidelines on the method of setting fines (2006) — Point 13 — Determination of the value of sales to which the infringement relates — Internal sales of the goods concerned outside the EEA — Inclusion of sales to third parties in the EEA of finished products incorporating the goods concerned.
Case C-231/14 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:292
- CELEX number:
- 62014CC0231
- Form:
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 30/04/2015
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 1 April 2014.
Fonnship A/S v Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet and Facket för Service och Kommunikation (SEKO) and Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet v Fonnship A/S.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbetsdomstolen.
Maritime transport — Freedom to provide services — Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 — Applicability to transport carried out from or to States that are parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) using vessels flying the flag of a third country — Industrial action taken in the ports of such a State in favour of third country nationals employed on those vessels — Nationality of those workers and vessels having no bearing on the applicability of EU law.
Case C‑83/13.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:201
- CELEX number:
- 62013CC0083
- Form:
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 01/04/2014
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 January 2012.
Association Kokopelli v Graines Baumaux SAS.
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Nancy.
Agriculture — Directives 98/95/EC, 2002/53/EC, 2002/55/EC and 2009/145/EC — Validity — Vegetables — Sale on the national seed market of vegetable seed not included in the official common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Non-compliance with system of prior authorisation for marketing — International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture — Principle of proportionality — Freedom to conduct a business — Free movement of goods — Equal treatment.
Case C‑59/11.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2012:28
- CELEX number:
- 62011CC0059
- Form:
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 19/01/2012
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011.
Air Transport Association of America and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.
Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Directive 2008/101/EC - Inclusion of aviation activities in that scheme - Validity - Chicago Convention - Kyoto Protocol - EU-United States Air Transport Agreement - Principles of customary international law - Legal effects thereof - Whether they may be relied upon - Extraterritoriality of European Union law - Meaning of ‘charges’, ‘fees’ and ‘taxes’.
Case C-366/10.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:864
- CELEX number:
- 62010CJ0366
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 21/12/2011
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011.
Air Transport Association of America and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.
Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Directive 2008/101/EC - Inclusion of aviation activities in that scheme - Validity - Chicago Convention - Kyoto Protocol - EU-United States Air Transport Agreement - Principles of customary international law - Legal effects thereof - Whether they may be relied upon - Extraterritoriality of European Union law - Meaning of ‘charges’, ‘fees’ and ‘taxes’.
Case C-366/10.
- CELEX number:
- 62010CJ0366_SUM
- Form:
- Summary
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 21/12/2011
Domain: All, Documents mentioning: 62010CC0366, Search language: English