Search Results

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2024.
SO v Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria GmbH (NADA) and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – National arbitration committee competent to combat doping in sport – Criteria – Independence of the body making the reference – Principle of effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-115/22.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:384

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 14 September 2023.
SO v Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria GmbH (NADA) and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – National arbitration committee competent to combat doping in sport – Criteria – Independence of the body making the reference – Principle of effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-115/22.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:676

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2023.
SC NV Construct SRL v Judeţul Timiş.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiliul Naţional de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Independence and compulsory nature of the jurisdiction of the national body concerned – Stability of the members of that body – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement procedures – Article 58 – Selection criteria – Possibility of including, amongst those criteria, obligations under special laws applicable to the activities connected with the contract in question and not set out as a criterion for selection in the procurement documents – Article 63(1) – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Not possible to require recourse to subcontracting.
Case C-403/21.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:47

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 22 décembre 2022.#Procédure engagée contre Úrad pre dohľad nad zdravotnou starostlivosťou e.a.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par l'Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 267 TFUE – Notion de “juridiction” – Critères structurels et fonctionnels – Exercice de fonctions juridictionnelles ou administratives – Obligation de coopération de l’organisme de renvoi – Directives 89/665/CEE et 2014/24/UE – Marchés publics – Organisme national de contrôle des procédures de passation des marchés publics – Habilitation à agir d’office – Pouvoir de sanction – Décisions susceptibles de faire l’objet d’un recours juridictionnel – Absence de litige devant l’organisme de renvoi – Irrecevabilité manifeste de la demande de décision préjudicielle.#Affaire C-204/22.

This document does not exist in English.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:1034

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.
RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-104/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:851

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022.
CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFUE – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-453/20.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:341

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2021.
Comune di Camerota.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti - Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Directive 2011/85/EU – Directive 2011/7/EU – Economic and monetary policy – Local authority in financial difficulty – Financial rebalancing plan – National legislation suspending the investigative powers of the Court of Auditors due to the health crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – No dispute before the referring body – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-161/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:833

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 8 July 2021.
BN and Others v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Tribunal previously established by law – Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime – Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates – Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed – Whether that body is to be considered to be an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law.
Case C-132/20.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section ; Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:557

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 March 2021.
XK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Procura della Repubblica di Trento.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Procura della Repubblica di Trento (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Trento, Italy) – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-66/20.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:200

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 January 2020.
Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Independence of the national body concerned — Irremovability of the members — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-274/14.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:17