English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Document 62014TJ0519
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 March 2024.#Grupo Morera & Vallejo, SL and DSA, Defensa y Servicios del Asegurado, SA v European Commission.#Case T-519/14.
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a opta extinsă) din 20 martie 2024.
Grupo Morera & Vallejo, SL și DSA, Defensa y Servicios del Asegurado, SA împotriva Comisiei Europene.
Cauza T-519/14.
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a opta extinsă) din 20 martie 2024.
Grupo Morera & Vallejo, SL și DSA, Defensa y Servicios del Asegurado, SA împotriva Comisiei Europene.
Cauza T-519/14.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:194
- Date of document:
- 20/03/2024
- Date lodged:
- 10/07/2014
- Author:
- Tribunalul
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Spania
- Form:
- Hotărâre
- Authentic language:
- spaniolă
- Type of procedure:
- Acţiune în anulare - neîntemeiată, Acţiune în anulare - pronunţare inutilă
- Applicant:
- Persoană fizică
- Defendant:
- Instituţii şi organisme ale UE, Comisia Europeană
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Kingston
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62014TA0519
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12007P016: N 20 53 74 106 - 108
- 12007P017-P1: N 110 111
- 12007P017: N 20 53 74 106
- 12007P052-P1: N 112
- 12008E107-P1: N 11 20
- 12008E107: N 53 60 64 69 83
- 12008E108-P2: N 113
- 12008E108: N 20 53 79
- 12008E108-P3: N 9 74 83
- 12008E263: N 1
- 12008E266: N 47
- 12008E288: N 80
- 12008E296: N 11
- 12008M003-P6: N 20 53 74
- 12008M004-P1: N 78
- 12008M004-P3: N 82
- 12008M005-P2: N 78
- 31999R0659-A14: N 20 53 74
- 31999R0659-A14P3: N 79 95
- 31999R0659-A14P1: N 79 95 113
- 32007D0256: N 10
- 32014D0200: N 1 3 8 9 11 14 15 23 29 32 36 50 54 62 72 100 102 105
- 32014D0200-A04P1: N 16 17 27 30 31 33 45 51 53 55 75 85 88 91 - 93 95 98 104 106 113 114 116 117
- 32014D0200-A01: N 16 17 27 30 31 33 45 51 55
- 32014D0200-A02: N 17 51
- 32014D0200-C11: N 37
- 32014D0200-C12: N 37
- 32014D0200-C162: N 37
- 32014D0200-C19: N 38
- 32014D0200-C263: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C264: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C265: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C266: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C267: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C268: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C269: N 41 42 44 - 46 48 49
- 32014D0200-C202: N 43
- 32014D0200-C116: N 61
- 32014D0200-C132: N 67
- 32014D0200-C142: N 67
- 32014D0200-C145: N 67
- 32014D0200-C238: N 70
- 32014D0200-C275: N 76
- 32014D0200-C276: N 85 88
- 32014D0200-C270: N 85 88 89
- 32014D0200-C271: N 85 88 90
- 32014D0200-C272: N 85 88 90
- 32014D0200-C273: N 85 88 90
- 32014D0200-C275: N 85 88 90
- 32014D0200-C274: N 85 88 90 104
- 52004XC0212(01): N 6
- 52011XC0921(01): N 2
- 61992CO0123-N10: N 24
- 61997CJ0372-N37: N 23 25
- 61997CJ0372-N38: N 25
- 61997CJ0372-N36: N 26
- 62000TJ0324-N116: N 23
- 62000TJ0324-N117: N 23
- 62001CJ0261-N74: N 83
- 62001CJ0261-N75: N 83
- 62004TJ0201-N1258: N 86
- 62005CJ0362-N42: N 22
- 62009CJ0529-N91: N 80
- 62010CJ0275: N 104
- 62011CJ0012-N44: N 87
- 62013CJ0069-N29: N 82
- 62013TJ0515: N 11 12
- 62013TJ0515(01): N 13 - 15 62
- 62013TO0303-N16: N 22
- 62016CJ0128: N 12
- 62018CJ0496-N69: N 86
- 62018CJ0686-N82: N 108
- 62018CJ0686-N83: N 109
- 62018CJ0686-N84: N 110
- 62018CJ0686-N85: N 111
- 62018CJ0686-N86: N 112
- 62020CJ0649-N13Ý: N 101
- 62020CJ0649: N 14 15 21 27 28 33 35 36 39 45 46 50 51 54 62 63 65 68
- 62020CJ0649-N130: N 81
- 62020CJ0649-N138: N 96 101
- 62020TJ0582-N215: N 105
- Notes relating to the decision:
-
- 1. Vuitton, Raphaël: Leasing fiscal : Le Tribunal de l’Union européenne rejette, en prenant appui sur les enseignements d’un arrêt de la Cour de justice dans une affaire “pilote”, des recours dirigés contre la décision de la Commission constatant que les aides octroyées dans le cadre du régime espagnol de leasing fiscal étaient partiellement incompatibles et devaient être récupérées (Derivados del Flúor e.a.), Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2024, nº 2, p. 134-135 (FR)
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
The HTML format is unavailable in your User interface language
All