EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0168
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-168/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.
Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-168/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.
Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-168/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:605