EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0264
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.#Uponor Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark SMATRIX — Prior EU figurative mark AsyMatrix — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Failure to assess an item of evidence produced before the Opposition Division.#Case T-264/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.
Uponor Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark SMATRIX — Prior EU figurative mark AsyMatrix — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Failure to assess an item of evidence produced before the Opposition Division.
Case T-264/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.
Uponor Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark SMATRIX — Prior EU figurative mark AsyMatrix — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Failure to assess an item of evidence produced before the Opposition Division.
Case T-264/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:329