This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0240
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Campine NV and Campine Recycling NV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for lead-acid car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Value of purchases — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Evidence of the infringement — Concept of single or repeated infringement — Duration of the infringement — Interruption of participation in the infringement — Restriction of competition by object — Mitigating circumstances — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-240/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
Campine NV and Campine Recycling NV v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for lead-acid car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Value of purchases — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Evidence of the infringement — Concept of single or repeated infringement — Duration of the infringement — Interruption of participation in the infringement — Restriction of competition by object — Mitigating circumstances — Unlimited jurisdiction.
Case T-240/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
Campine NV and Campine Recycling NV v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for lead-acid car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Value of purchases — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Evidence of the infringement — Concept of single or repeated infringement — Duration of the infringement — Interruption of participation in the infringement — Restriction of competition by object — Mitigating circumstances — Unlimited jurisdiction.
Case T-240/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:778