EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0900
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 June 2018.#Casual Dreams, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Reputation — Advantage unfairly taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.#Case T-900/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 June 2018.
Casual Dreams, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Reputation — Advantage unfairly taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.
Case T-900/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 June 2018.
Casual Dreams, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Reputation — Advantage unfairly taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.
Case T-900/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:327