EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TJ0366
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 14 December 2016.#Viara Todorova Androva v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2011 promotion procedure — Non-inclusion on the list of officials eligible for promotion — Action at first instance dismissed — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Obligation on the court hearing the substantive application to investigate — Plea of illegality — Rule of correspondence between the complaint and the action before the EU Courts.#Case T-366/15 P.
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 14 December 2016.
Viara Todorova Androva v Council of the European Union.
Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2011 promotion procedure — Non-inclusion on the list of officials eligible for promotion — Action at first instance dismissed — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Obligation on the court hearing the substantive application to investigate — Plea of illegality — Rule of correspondence between the complaint and the action before the EU Courts.
Case T-366/15 P.
Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 14 December 2016.
Viara Todorova Androva v Council of the European Union.
Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2011 promotion procedure — Non-inclusion on the list of officials eligible for promotion — Action at first instance dismissed — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Obligation on the court hearing the substantive application to investigate — Plea of illegality — Rule of correspondence between the complaint and the action before the EU Courts.
Case T-366/15 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2016:729