EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TJ0312
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2016.#Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MITOCHRON — Earlier national word mark MIVACRON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-312/15.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2016.
Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MITOCHRON — Earlier national word mark MIVACRON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-312/15.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2016.
Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MITOCHRON — Earlier national word mark MIVACRON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-312/15.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2016:303