This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TO0805
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 May 2016.#Stagecoach Group plc v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Application for a European Union word mark MEGABUS.COM — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-805/14.
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 May 2016.
Stagecoach Group plc v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
European Union trade mark — Application for a European Union word mark MEGABUS.COM — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-805/14.
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 May 2016.
Stagecoach Group plc v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
European Union trade mark — Application for a European Union word mark MEGABUS.COM — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-805/14.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2016:336