Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in industrial plastic bags — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Action for damages — Default interest — Concept of a debt which is certain, of a fixed amount and due — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Principle that penalties must be specific to the individual and to the offence — Lack of legal basis — Article 266 TFEU — Causal link.#Case T-669/14.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2016.
Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in industrial plastic bags — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Action for damages — Default interest — Concept of a debt which is certain, of a fixed amount and due — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Principle that penalties must be specific to the individual and to the offence — Lack of legal basis — Article 266 TFEU — Causal link.
Case T-669/14.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2016.
Trioplast Industrier AB v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in industrial plastic bags — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Action for damages — Default interest — Concept of a debt which is certain, of a fixed amount and due — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Principle that penalties must be specific to the individual and to the offence — Lack of legal basis — Article 266 TFEU — Causal link.
Case T-669/14.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2016:285