Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2014.#Evonik Oil Additives GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark VISCOTECH — Earlier national and international word marks VISCOPLEX — Evidence of the territorial extent and validity of an earlier international trade mark — Rule 19(2) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) 2868/95 — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T‑138/13.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2014.
Evonik Oil Additives GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark VISCOTECH — Earlier national and international word marks VISCOPLEX — Evidence of the territorial extent and validity of an earlier international trade mark — Rule 19(2) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) 2868/95 — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T‑138/13.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2014.
Evonik Oil Additives GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark VISCOTECH — Earlier national and international word marks VISCOPLEX — Evidence of the territorial extent and validity of an earlier international trade mark — Rule 19(2) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) 2868/95 — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T‑138/13.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2014:973