Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011TO0531

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2012.
Hamas v Council of the European Union.
Annulment action - Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism - Lis pendens.
Case T-531/11.

European Court Reports 2012 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:317





Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2012 —
Hamas v Council

(Case T-531/11)

Annulment action — Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism — Lis pendens

1.                     Proceedings — Objection of lis pendens — Same parties, subject-matter and submissions in two actions — Inadmissibility of the second action (see para. 15)

2.                     Proceedings — Pleas in the application — Modification in the course of proceedings — Assimilation to the bringing of an action by means of an application (see para. 16)

Re:

Initially, action for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011 of 18 July 2011 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulations No 610/2010 and (EU) No 83/2011 (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 2), and Council Decision 2011/430/CFSP of 18 July 2011 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 47), in so far as the applicant organisation’s name is maintained on the list of persons, groups and entities to which the freezing of funds and economic resources laid down with a view to combating terrorism.

Operative part

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2.

There is no need to give a ruling on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.

3.

Hamas is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union.

Top