This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TO0243
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2011.#Glaxo Group Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility.#Case T-243/11.
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2011.
Glaxo Group Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility.
Case T-243/11.
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2011.
Glaxo Group Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility.
Case T-243/11.
European Court Reports 2011 II-00379*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:649
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2011 – Glaxo Group v OHIM – Farmodiética (ADVANCE)
(Case T-243/11)
Community trade mark – Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third party – Inadmissibility
Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Conditions relating to a signatory – Third party capacity in relation to the parties – Application signed by an internal lawyer of a group company – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 19 and 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 43(1), first para.) (see paras 13, 15, 18-19)
Re:
| ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2011 (Case R 665/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmodiética – Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, L | da | and Glaxo Group Ltd. |
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Glaxo Group Ltd is ordered pay the costs. |