Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TJ0107

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2011.
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark NATURAVIVA - Earlier Community word mark VIVA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No similarity of the signs.
Case T-107/10.

European Court Reports 2011 II-00338*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:551





Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2011 – Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne v OHIM – Natura Cosméticos (NATURAVIVA)

(Case T-107/10)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark NATURAVIVA – Earlier Community word mark VIVA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 – No similarity of the signs

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 46, 50-51, 56)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 November 2009 (Case R 1558/2008‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH and Natura Cosméticos, SA.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne GmbH to pay the costs.

Top