Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2014.#Arkema France and CECA SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Duration of the infringement — Limitation — Legitimate interest in finding that an infringement was committed — Application for variation — Amount of the fines — Duration of the infringements — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Joined Cases T‑23/10 and T‑24/10.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2014.
Arkema France and CECA SA v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Duration of the infringement — Limitation — Legitimate interest in finding that an infringement was committed — Application for variation — Amount of the fines — Duration of the infringements — Unlimited jurisdiction.
Joined Cases T‑23/10 and T‑24/10.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2014.
Arkema France and CECA SA v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Duration of the infringement — Limitation — Legitimate interest in finding that an infringement was committed — Application for variation — Amount of the fines — Duration of the infringements — Unlimited jurisdiction.
Joined Cases T‑23/10 and T‑24/10.

European Court Reports 2014 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2014:62