EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TJ0395
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.#Gigaset AG (formerly Arques Industries AG) v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Duration of the infringement — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Joint and several liability for payment of a fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T‑395/09.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.
Gigaset AG (formerly Arques Industries AG) v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Duration of the infringement — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Joint and several liability for payment of a fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.
Case T‑395/09.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.
Gigaset AG (formerly Arques Industries AG) v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Duration of the infringement — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Joint and several liability for payment of a fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.
Case T‑395/09.
European Court Reports 2014 -00000
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2014:23