Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.#SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Rights of the defence — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Joint and several liability for payment of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T‑384/09.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.
SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Rights of the defence — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Joint and several liability for payment of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.
Case T‑384/09.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.
SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH v European Commission.
Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Rights of the defence — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Joint and several liability for payment of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.
Case T‑384/09.

European Court Reports 2014 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2014:27