Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62007TJ0353

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2009.
Esber, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark COLORIS - Earlier national word mark COLORIS - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 15(2)(a) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 15(1)(a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
Case T-353/07.

European Court Reports 2009 II-00226*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2009:475





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2009 – Esber v OHIM – Coloris Global Coloring Concept (COLORIS)

(Case T-353/07)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark COLORIS – Earlier national word mark COLORIS – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier trade mark – Article 15(2)(a) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 15(1)(a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Observations of third parties and opposition – Examination of the opposition – Proof of use of the earlier mark – Use in a form without differences capable of affecting the distinctive character of the trade mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 15(2)(a) and 43(2) and (3)) (see paras 36, 50)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 June 2007 (Case R 1060/2006‑1), concerning opposition proceedings between Coloris Global Coloring Concept and Esber, SA.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Esber, SA

Community trade mark sought:

Figurative mark containing the word COLORIS for goods in Class 2 – Application No 2817732

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Coloris Global Coloring Concept

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

French national word mark COLORIS for goods in Class 2 (No 98/717642)

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Esber, SA to pay the costs.


Top