Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62005TO0127

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2007.
Lootus Teine Osaühing (Lootus) v Council of the European Union.
Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 - Fisheries - Fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 - Persons directly and individually concerned - Inadmissibility.
Case T-127/05.

European Court Reports 2007 II-00001*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2007:2





Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2007 – Lootus Teine Osaühing v Council

(Case T-127/05)

Action for annulment – Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 – Fisheries – Fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 – Persons directly and individually concerned – Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Council Regulations Nos 2269/2004 and 2270/2004) (see paras 39-47)

Re:

ACTION for annulment in part of, first, the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 of 20 December 2004 amending Regulations (EC) Nos 2340/2002 and 2347/2002 as concerns fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 1) and, second, Part 2 of the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 and 2006 the fishing opportunities for Community fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 4), in so far as those provisions concern the fishing opportunities allocated to Estonia.

Operative part

The Court:

 

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

 

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council;

 

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.

Top