EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005TJ0210
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 November 2008. # Nalocebar - Consultores e Serviços, Ldª v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings -Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello di Capri - Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-210/05.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 November 2008.
Nalocebar - Consultores e Serviços, Ldª v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings -Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello di Capri - Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-210/05.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 November 2008.
Nalocebar - Consultores e Serviços, Ldª v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings -Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello di Capri - Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-210/05.
European Court Reports 2008 II-00245*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2008:482
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 November 2008 – Nalocebar v OHIM – Limiñana y Botella (Limoncello di Capri)
(Case T-210/05)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings –Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello di Capri – Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25-27, 51-53)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 March 2005 (Case R 646/2004-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Limiñana y Botella, SL and Nalocebar – Consultores e Serviços Ld | a | . |
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark: |
Big Ben Establishment Ltd. The applicant acquired the application for registration lodged by Big Ben Establishment |
Community trade mark sought: |
Figurative mark Limoncello di Capri for goods in Classes 30, 32 and 33 |
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: |
Limiñana y Botella, SL |
Mark or sign cited in opposition: |
Spanish word mark Limonchelo for goods in Class 33 |
Decision of the Opposition Division: |
Registration refused |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: |
Appeal dismissed |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Nalocebar – Consultores e Serviços Lda to pay the costs. |