EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001TJ0308
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2003. # Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Opposition procedure - Genuine use of earlier mark - Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal - Assessment of the evidence produced in the proceedings before the Opposition Division. # Case T-308/01.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2003.
Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Opposition procedure - Genuine use of earlier mark - Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal - Assessment of the evidence produced in the proceedings before the Opposition Division.
Case T-308/01.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2003.
Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Opposition procedure - Genuine use of earlier mark - Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal - Assessment of the evidence produced in the proceedings before the Opposition Division.
Case T-308/01.
European Court Reports 2003 II-03253
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2003:241
«(Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Opposition procedure – Genuine use of earlier mark – Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal – Assessment of the evidence produced in the procedure before the Opposition Division)»
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 61(1) and 62(1))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber)
23 September 2003 (1)
((Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Opposition procedure – Genuine use of earlier mark – Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal – Assessment of the evidence produced in the procedure before the Opposition Division))
In Case T-308/01, Henkel KGaA, established in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by C. Osterrieth, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by O. Waelbroeck, acting as Agent,defendant, the other party to the proceedings before the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being: LHS (UK) Ltd,established in Cheadle Hulme (United Kingdom),
APPEAL against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 September 2001 (Case R-738/2000-3) concerning opposition proceedings between Henkel KGaA and LHS (UK) Ltd,THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Second Chamber),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 15 January 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber)
hereby:
Forwood |
Pirrung |
Meij |
H. Jung |
N.J. Forwood |
Registrar |
President |