Vælg de eksperimentelle funktioner, som du ønsker at prøve

Dette dokument er et uddrag fra EUR-Lex

Dokument 62022TJ0315

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 July 2023.
    Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Sütat – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard.
    Case T-315/22.

    Samling af Afgørelser – Retten – afsnittet "Oplysninger om ikke-offentliggjorte afgørelser"

    ECLI-indikator: ECLI:EU:T:2023:432

     Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 July 2023 –
    Yayla Türk v EUIPO – Marmara Import-Export (Sütat)

    (Case T‑315/22) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Sütat – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard)

    1. 

    Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application – Reference to statement submitted to the Board of Appeal reproduced in the application – Inadmissibility – Re-use, in the application, of certain passages from written submissions lodged with the Board of Appeal – Admissibility

    (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d))

    (see paragraphs 21, 23)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Marks consisting exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of a product or service – Concept

    (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paragraphs 29, 30, 58)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Marks consisting exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of a product or service – Assessment of the descriptive character of a sign – Criteria – Breakdown of a word sign into word elements having concrete significance

    (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paragraphs 31, 38, 50, 59, 61, 76)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Marks consisting exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of a product or service – Word mark Sütat

    (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paragraphs 39-41, 52-54, 66, 68)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Decisions of EUIPO – Observance of the rights of the defence – Scope of the principle

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), second sentence)

    (see paragraphs 80, 82)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 276, 18.7.2022.

    Op