This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0272
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment – Concept of ‘association’ – Proportionality.
Case T-272/22.
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment – Concept of ‘association’ – Proportionality.
Case T-272/22.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:491
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2023 –
Pumpyanskaya v Council
(Case T‑272/22) ( 1 )
(Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment – Concept of ‘association’ – Proportionality)
1. |
European Union – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Scope of the review – Proof that the measure is well founded – Obligation on the competent EU authority to establish, in the event of challenge, that the reasons relied on against the persons or entities concerned are well founded (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Annex; Council Regulations No 269/2014 and 2022/396, Annex) (see paragraphs 28-31, 40) |
2. |
European Union – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Scope of the review – Inclusion of the applicant on the list annexed to the contested decision due to her association with a leading businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of Russia – Publicly available documents – Probative value (Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Annex; Council Regulations No 269/2014 and 2022/396, Annex) (see paragraphs 33, 36-40) |
3. |
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Criteria for adopting restrictive measures – Leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of Russia and persons associated with them – Concept of association – Common interests (Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Art. 2(1)(g); Council Regulations No 269/2014, Art. 3(1)(g) and 2022/396) (see paragraphs 43, 63) |
4. |
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Action for annulment brought by a person who is the subject of a fund-freezing decision – Allocation of the burden of proof – Decision based on a set of indicia – Probative value – Scope (Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Annex; Council Regulations No 269/2014 and 2022/396, Annex) (see paragraphs 54, 70, 71, 83, 84) |
5. |
European Union – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Scope of the review – Assessment of the legality by reference to the information available at the time of adoption of the decision (Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Annex; Council Regulations No 269/2014 and 2022/396, Annex) (see paragraphs 58, 59) |
6. |
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds of certain persons and entities having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Restriction on the right to respect for private and family life and the right to property – Breach of principle of proportionality – None (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 7, 17 and 52(1); Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Arts 1(6), 2(3) and (4), and Annex; Council Regulations No 269/2014, Arts 4(1), 5(1) and 6(1), and 2022/396, Annex) (see paragraphs 89-93, 95-104, 107, 109) |
7. |
European Union – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Scope of the review – Restricted review for general rules – Criteria for adopting restrictive measures – Leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of Russia and natural or legal persons associated with them – Compliance with the principle of legal certainty requiring clarity, precision and foreseeability of the effects of legal rules (Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/397, Art. 2(1)(g) Council Regulations No 269/2014, Art. 3(1)(b) and 2022/ 396) (see paragraphs 113-120) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Ms Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 257, 4.7.2022