This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TJ0818
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.
Dvectis CZ s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a support pillow – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons.
Case T-818/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.
Dvectis CZ s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a support pillow – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons.
Case T-818/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:486
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2020 –
Dvectis CZ v EUIPO – Yado (Support pillow)
(Case T‑818/19)
(Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a support pillow – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons)
1. |
Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design – Criteria for assessment – Freedom of the designer (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6 and 25(1)(b)) (see paras 21, 46, 47) |
2. |
Community designs – Application for registration – Conditions – Indication of the goods (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Art. 36(2) and (6)) (see paras 30, 31) |
3. |
Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design – Representation of a support pillow (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1) and 25(1)(b)) (see paras 40, 44, 52, 67-69) |
4. |
Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design – Informed user – Definition (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1) and 25(1)(b)) (see paras 41, 42) |
5. |
Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – Design not giving the informed user a different overall impression from that produced by the earlier design – Global assessment of all the elements of the earlier design (Council Regulation No 6/2002, Arts 6(1) and 25(1)(b)) (see paras 54-56, 61, 62) |
6. |
Community designs – Procedural provisions – Statement of reasons for decisions – First sentence of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Scope identical to that of Article 296 TFEU (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Regulation No 6/2002, Art. 62, first sentence) (see paras 73, 75) |
7. |
Community designs – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Decision of an EUIPO body forming part of the context of the decision of the Board of Appeal (see para. 78) |
8. |
Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Plea based on absence or inadequacy of the statement of reasons – Plea alleging incorrectness of the statement of reasons – Distinction (Art. 296 TFEU) (see para. 81) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2019 (Case R 513/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Yado and Dvectis CZ.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Dvectis CZ s. r. o. to pay the costs. |