This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0858
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023.
Dow Silicones Corp., anciennement Dow Corning Corp. and Others v European Commission.
State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery.
Cases T-858/16 and T-867/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023.
Dow Silicones Corp., anciennement Dow Corning Corp. and Others v European Commission.
State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery.
Cases T-858/16 and T-867/16.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:570
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023 –
Dow Silicones and Others v Commission
(Cases T‑858/16 and T‑867/16) ( 1 )
(State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery)
1. |
Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Tax measures – Joint examination of the conditions of selectivity and economic advantage – Whether permissible (Art. 107(1) TFEU) (see paragraphs 21-23) |
2. |
Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Tax measures – Tax ruling – Reference framework for determining the existence of an advantage and of its selective nature – Taking only national law into account – Administrative practice that is contrary to the applicable legislation not included in the reference framework – Whether permissible (Art. 107(1) TFEU) (see paragraphs 34-70) |
3. |
Judicial proceedings – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Plea raised for the first time at the reply stage – Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 83; Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, point 130) (see paragraphs 77-82) |
4. |
Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in the form of a tax exemption – Recovery leading to a risk of double taxation for the recipient undertaking – No impact on the obligation of recovery – Breach of the principle of prevention of double taxation – None (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 16) (see paragraphs 95-102) |
5. |
Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Restoration of the prior situation – Breach of the principles of proportionality and equal treatment – None (Arts 107 and 108 TFEU) (see paragraphs 104-109) |
6. |
Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in the form of a tax exemption – Reductions in the tax burden of national entities forming part of multinational groups – Identification of the national entities and the multinational groups as beneficiaries of the aid – Recovery ordered from the multinational groups concerned – Whether permissible (Art. 108(2) TFEU) (see paragraphs 115-118) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Orders that Cases T‑858/16 and T‑867/16 be joined for the purposes of the present judgment; |
2. |
Dismisses the actions; |
3. |
Orders Dow Silicones Corp. and Dow Silicones Belgium to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T‑858/16; |
4. |
Orders Vinventions to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T‑867/16. |
( 1 ) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.