Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TJ0858

    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023.
    Dow Silicones Corp., anciennement Dow Corning Corp. and Others v European Commission.
    State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery.
    Cases T-858/16 and T-867/16.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:570

     Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023 –
    Dow Silicones and Others v Commission

    (Cases T‑858/16 and T‑867/16) ( 1 )

    (State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery)

    1. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Tax measures – Joint examination of the conditions of selectivity and economic advantage – Whether permissible

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 21-23)

    2. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Tax measures – Tax ruling – Reference framework for determining the existence of an advantage and of its selective nature – Taking only national law into account – Administrative practice that is contrary to the applicable legislation not included in the reference framework – Whether permissible

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 34-70)

    3. 

    Judicial proceedings – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Plea raised for the first time at the reply stage – Inadmissibility

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 83; Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, point 130)

    (see paragraphs 77-82)

    4. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in the form of a tax exemption – Recovery leading to a risk of double taxation for the recipient undertaking – No impact on the obligation of recovery – Breach of the principle of prevention of double taxation – None

    (Art. 108 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 16)

    (see paragraphs 95-102)

    5. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Restoration of the prior situation – Breach of the principles of proportionality and equal treatment – None

    (Arts 107 and 108 TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 104-109)

    6. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in the form of a tax exemption – Reductions in the tax burden of national entities forming part of multinational groups – Identification of the national entities and the multinational groups as beneficiaries of the aid – Recovery ordered from the multinational groups concerned – Whether permissible

    (Art. 108(2) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 115-118)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Orders that Cases T‑858/16 and T‑867/16 be joined for the purposes of the present judgment;

    2. 

    Dismisses the actions;

    3. 

    Orders Dow Silicones Corp. and Dow Silicones Belgium to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T‑858/16;

    4. 

    Orders Vinventions to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T‑867/16.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.

    Top