This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CO0206
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2015.
Sun Mark Ltd and Bulldog Energy Drink Ltd v Red Bull GmbH.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Community trade mark — Appeal brought by the ‘other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal’ who failed to lodge a response before the General Court — No status as intervener before the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-206/15 P.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2015.
Sun Mark Ltd and Bulldog Energy Drink Ltd v Red Bull GmbH.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Community trade mark — Appeal brought by the ‘other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal’ who failed to lodge a response before the General Court — No status as intervener before the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-206/15 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2015 —
Sun Mark and Bulldog Energy Drink v Red Bull
(Case C‑206/15 P)
‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Community trade mark — Appeal brought by the ‘other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal’ who failed to lodge a response before the General Court — No status as intervener before the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible’
Appeal — Admissibility — Appeal brought by a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal which did not participate in the proceedings before the General Court — No status as intervener before the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 56, second para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court (1991), Arts 134(1) and 135(1)) (see paras 29-31)
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal. |
|
2. |
Orders Sun Mark Ltd and Bulldog Energy Drink Ltd to bear their own costs. |