EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TJ0543

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 February 2016.
provima Warenhandels GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark HOT SOX — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-543/14.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 February 2016 —

provima Warenhandels v OHIM — Renfro (HOT SOX)

(Case T‑543/14)

‛Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark HOT SOX — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009’

1. 

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Assessment of the descriptive nature of a sign — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c); Art. 52(1)(a); Art. 158) (see paras 16-18, 20, 40)

2. 

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Word mark composed of several elements — Taking into account the overall perception of the mark by the relevant public — Linguistic knowledge of the public (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 19, 52)

3. 

Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Word mark HOT SOX (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 21, 37, 47, 49, 55)

4. 

Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Registration contrary to Article 7 — Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for nullity — Date of lodging the application for registration (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 52(1)(a)) (see para. 44)

5. 

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Assessment of the registrability of a sign — EU rules only taken into account — Earlier registration of the mark in certain Member States or third countries — Decisions not binding EU bodies (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see para. 50)

6. 

Community trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — OHIM’s previous decision-making practice — Principle of legality (see para. 54)

7. 

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Concept — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 60, 61)

8. 

Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Word mark HOT SOX (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 63-66)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2014 (Case R 1859/2013-2), concerning invalidity proceedings between provima Warenhandels GmbH and Renfro Corp.

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders provima Warenhandels GmbH to bear the costs.

Top