Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TJ0707

    Steinbeck v OHMI - Alfred Sternjakob (BE HAPPY)

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2015 —

    Steinbeck v OHIM — Alfred Sternjakob (BE HAPPY)

    (Joined Cases T‑707/13 and T‑709/13)

    ‛Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word marks BE HAPPY — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009’

    1. 

    Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Concept — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 19-21, 25, 38, 44, 52)

    2. 

    Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Marks constituted of advertising slogans — Distinctive character — Application of specific criteria for assessment — Not permissible (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 22, 23, 42, 56)

    3. 

    Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Marks constituted of advertising slogans — Slogan carrying an objective message (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 57)

    4. 

    Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Word mark BE HAPPY (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(b), and 52(1)(a)) (see paras 27-30, 34, 35, 47, 48)

    5. 

    Community trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — OHIM’s previous decision-making practice (see paras 64, 65)

    Re:

    Two actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 October 2013 (Cases R 31/2013-1 and R 32/2013-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Alfred Sternjakob GmbH & Co. KG and Steinbeck GmbH.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the actions;

    2. 

    Orders Steinbeck GmbH to pay the costs.

    Top