EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TJ0156

Petro Suisse Intertrade v Council

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 September 2015 —

Petro Suisse Intertrade v Council

(Joined Cases T‑156/13 and T‑373/14)

‛Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Infra-State body — Locus standi and interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Right to be heard — Obligation to notify — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property’

1. 

Actions for annulment — Admissibility criteria — Interest in bringing proceedings — Natural or legal persons — Action brought by an emanation of a non-member State — Action directed against a measure instituting restrictive measures in its regard — Admissibility (Art. 29 TEU; Arts 263, fourth para., TFEU, and 275, second para., TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47) (see paras 39-43)

2. 

Actions for annulment — Time-limits — Point from which time starts to run — Measure entailing restrictive measures against a person or body — Measure published and notified to the addressees — Date of notification of the measure (Art. 263, sixth para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1); Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP, Art. 24(3); Council Regulation No 267/2012, Art. 46(3)) (see paras 46-52)

3. 

Actions for annulment — Grounds — Lack of or inadequate statement of reasons — Separate ground from the one concerning substantive legality (Arts 263 TFEU and 296 TFEU) (see para. 61)

4. 

Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Minimum requirements (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see paras 63-67, 69-71)

5. 

Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Alternative criteria fixed by EU measures for the inclusion of an entity in the lists of persons and entities concerned by the restrictive measures — Sufficiency of reasoning based on only one of those criteria (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see para. 80)

6. 

EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — No right to be heard prior to the adoption of such measures — Rights guaranteed by judicial review exercised by the EU judicature and by the possibility of a hearing after the measures are taken — Obligation to disclose incriminating evidence — Scope (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see paras 89-92, 95, 107)

7. 

Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Plea raised for the first time at the reply stage — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the General Court (2015), Arts 76(d), and 84(1)) (see paras 114, 115)

8. 

European Union — Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions — Restrictive measures against Iran — Measures in the context of the fight against nuclear proliferation — Ambit of the review (Art. 275, second para., TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see paras 120, 121)

9. 

Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Obligation to extend that measure to entities owned or controlled by such an entity — Whether an entity is owned or controlled — Assessment on a case-by-case basis by the Council — Implementation of relevant provisions of European Union law — Council’s lack of discretion (Council Decisions 2010/413/CFSP, Art. 20(1)(c), and 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulations No 267/2012, Art. 23(2)(d), and No 1264/2012) (see paras 122-125, 127)

10. 

Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of the funds of entities owned or controlled by an entity known to participate in nuclear proliferation — Restriction of the right to property and the free exercise of an economic activity — No breach of principle of proportionality (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 16 and 17; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see para. 138)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 71) and also of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 55), and, secondly, of the Council’s decision contained in its letter of 14 March 2014 to maintain the restrictive measures taken against the applicant.

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders Petro Suisse Intertrade Co. SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

Top

Keywords
Subject of the case
Operative part

Keywords

Actions for annulment — Admissibility criteria — Interest in bringing proceedings — Natural or legal persons — Action brought by an emanation of a non-member State — Action directed against a measure instituting restrictive measures in its regard — Admissibility (Art. 29 TEU; Arts 263, fourth para., TFEU, and 275, second para., TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47) (see paras 39-43)

2. Actions for annulment — Time-limits — Point from which time starts to run — Measure entailing restrictive measures against a person or body — Measure published and notified to the addressees — Date of notification of the measure (Art. 263, sixth para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1); Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP, Art. 24(3); Council Regulation No 267/2012, Art. 46(3)) (see paras 46-52)

3. Actions for annulment — Grounds — Lack of or inadequate statement of reasons — Separate ground from the one concerning substantive legality (Arts 263 TFEU and 296 TFEU) (see para. 61)

4. Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Minimum requirements (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see paras 63-67, 69-71)

5. Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Alternative criteria fixed by EU measures for the inclusion of an entity in the lists of persons and entities concerned by the restrictive measures — Sufficiency of reasoning based on only one of those criteria (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see para. 80)

6. EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — No right to be heard prior to the adoption of such measures — Rights guaranteed by judicial review exercised by the EU judicature and by the possibility of a hearing after the measures are taken — Obligation to disclose incriminating evidence — Scope (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see paras 89-92, 95, 107)

7. Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Plea raised for the first time at the reply stage — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the General Court (2015), Arts 76(d), and 84(1)) (see paras 114, 115)

8. European Union — Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions — Restrictive measures against Iran — Measures in the context of the fight against nuclear proliferation — Ambit of the review (Art. 275, second para., TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see paras 120, 121)

9. Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Obligation to extend that measure to entities owned or controlled by such an entity — Whether an entity is owned or controlled — Assessment on a case-by-case basis by the Council — Implementation of relevant provisions of European Union law — Council’s lack of discretion (Council Decisions 2010/413/CFSP, Art. 20(1)(c), and 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulations No 267/2012, Art. 23(2)(d), and No 1264/2012) (see paras 122-125, 127)

10. Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of the funds of entities owned or controlled by an entity known to participate in nuclear proliferation — Restriction of the right to property and the free exercise of an economic activity — No breach of principle of proportionality (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 16 and 17; Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP; Council Regulation No 1264/2012) (see para. 138)

Subject of the case

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 71) and also of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 55), and, secondly, of the Council’s decision contained in its letter of 14 March 2014 to maintain the restrictive measures taken against the applicant.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Petro Suisse Intertrade Co. SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

Top