Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TJ0120

Summary of the Judgment

Keywords
Subject of the case
Operative part

Keywords

Actions for annulment

Natural or legal persons

Measures of direct and individual concern to them

Possibility of being individually concerned by a general decision

Conditions

Commission regulation designed to establish the rules for applying the work programme for examining all existing active substances

Action brought by procducers of active substances

Not individually concerned

Inadmissibility (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Commission Regulation No 1451/2007) (see paras 34-38, 44-46, 49-50

)

Subject of the case

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Article 3(2), Article 4, Article 7(3), the second subparagraph of Article 14(2), Article 15(3), Article 17 of and Annex II to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007 of 4 December 2007 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ 2007, L 325, p. 3).

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union;

3. Orders Arch Chemicals, Inc., Arch Timber Protection Ltd, Rhodia UK Ltd, Sumitomo Chemical (UK) plc and Troy Chemical Co. BV to bear their own costs;

4. Orders the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) to bear its own costs.

Top