Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TJ0036

    Summary of the Judgment

    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2008 Zipcar v OHIM Canary Islands Car (ZIPCAR)

    (Case T-36/07)

    ‛Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ZIPCAR — Earlier national word mark CICAR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94’

    Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 47-50)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 November 2006 (Case R 122/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Canary Islands Car, SL and Zipcar, Inc.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade mark:

    Zipcar, Inc.

    Community trade mark sought:

    Word mark ZIPCAR for goods and services in Classes 9, 39 and 42 Application No 3139375

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

    Canary Islands Car, SL

    Mark or sign cited in opposition:

    National word mark CICAR for services in Class 39

    Decision of the Opposition Division:

    Opposition upheld in relation to the Class 39 services cited

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeal dismissed

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Zipcar, Inc. to pay the costs.

    Top