EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0303
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-303/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.
Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.
Case T-303/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.
Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.
Case T-303/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:232
- Date of document:
- 03/05/2023
- Date lodged:
- 23/05/2022
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Italy
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- Italian
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - successful, Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Nõmm
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62022TA0303
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E263: N 1
- 32015Q0423(01)-A188: N 19
- 32015Q0423(01)-A85P3: N 22
- 32017R1001-A72P2: N 18
- 32017R1001: N 25
- 32017R1001-A60: N 27 32
- 32017R1001-A08P2LA: N 29
- 32017R1001-A07P1LG: N 7
- 32017R1001-A59P1LA: N 7
- 32017R1001-A60P1LA: N 7 8
- 32017R1001-A08P1LB: N 7 8 13 27 29 31 32 101 102
- 32017R1001-A08P1: N 91
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 96
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 30
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 30
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 30
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 30
- 62003TJ0057-N17: N 18
- 62003TJ0081-N76: N 31
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 96
- 62003TJ0153-N32: N 62
- 62003TJ0312-N37: N 53
- 62004CJ0416-N55: N 18
- 62004TJ0256-N42: N 33
- 62005CJ0029-N53: N 18
- 62005CJ0334-N35: N 45
- 62006CJ0171-N59: N 94
- 62006TJ0165-N22: N 19
- 62006TJ0363-N63: N 94
- 62009TJ0035-N42: N 42
- 62009TJ0035-N43: N 42
- 62009TJ0035-N44: N 42
- 62009TJ0035-N45: N 42
- 62009TJ0221-N29: N 69
- 62009TJ0378-N32: N 69
- 62009TJ0378-N33: N 69
- 62011TJ0249-N21: N 35
- 62012TJ0548-N69: N 89
- 62013TJ0618-N33: N 52
- 62015TJ0214-N149: N 88
- 62017TJ0036-N96: N 88
- 62017TJ0165-N49: N 43
- 62017TJ0165-N50: N 43
- 62017TJ0165-N51: N 43
- 62017TJ0210-N22: N 95
- 62018TJ0403-N3: N 68
- 62018TJ0403-N39: N 68
- 62018TJ0502-N40: N 79
- 62018TJ0502-N44: N 83
- 62018TJ0695-N32: N 41
- 62018TJ0695-N33: N 41
- 62018TJ0695-N34: N 41
- 62018TJ0695-N35: N 41
- 62020TJ0250-N20: N 24 25
- 62021TJ0093-N48: N 39
- 62021TJ0099-N86: N 51
- 62021TJ0423-N52: N 42
- 62021TJ0572-N33: N 63
- 62021TJ0696-N68: N 57
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
