This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0623
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Puma – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-623/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2022.
Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Puma – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-623/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2022.
Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Puma – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-623/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:776
- Date of document:
- 07/12/2022
- Date lodged:
- 29/09/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Germany
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-94/23 P
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- EU institutions and bodies, European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Frimodt Nielsen
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62021TA0623
- Review of judgement requested by 62023CN0094
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E263: N 1
- 12008E296: N 107
- 31989L0104-A05P2: N 23
- 32015Q0423(01)-A188: N 95
- 32017R1001-A94P1SNT1: N 107
- 32017R1001-A08P2: N 18
- 32017R1001-A08P1: N 27
- 32017R1001-A08P1LB: N 45 46
- 32017R1001-A08P5: N 6 15 18 - 22 25 27 28 44 - 46 61 68 77 103 119 122
- 62001CJ0408-N30: N 23
- 62003TJ0215-N35: N 19 20
- 62003TJ0215-N34: N 20
- 62004TJ0007(01)-N81: N 107
- 62005TJ0364-N89: N 39
- 62006TJ0165-N22: N 95
- 62007CJ0102-N42: N 23
- 62007CJ0252-N41: N 23
- 62007CJ0252-N42: N 23 61
- 62007CJ0252-N35: N 29
- 62007CJ0252-N36: N 29
- 62007CJ0252-N34: N 36 53
- 62007CJ0252-N49: N 41
- 62007CJ0252-N51: N 80
- 62007CJ0252-N52: N 80
- 62007CJ0252-N53: N 80
- 62009CJ0552-N51: N 45
- 62009CJ0552-N53: N 46
- 62012CJ0252-N39: N 61
- 62012TJ0480-N26: N 22
- 62014CJ0603-N39: N 45
- 62014TJ0071-N32: N 91
- 62015TJ0374-N143: N 42
- 62015TJ0637-N29: N 20
- 62016CJ0471-N50: N 21
- 62016CJ0471-N52: N 67
- 62016CJ0564-N60: N 108
- 62016CJ0564-N61: N 108
- 62016CJ0564-N66: N 109
- 62016TJ0062: N 106 109
- 62016TJ0062-N83: N 107
- 62016TJ0062-N23: N 120
- 62016TJ0062-N31: N 27
- 62016TJ0062-N46: N 84
- 62016TJ0817-N132: N 108
- 62017CJ0162-N60: N 108
- 62018TJ0459-N182: N 68
- 62018TJ0679-N96: N 110
- 62019TJ0042-N69: N 109
- 62019TJ0820-N26: N 22
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
