This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0523
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Alexander Evgenevich Shatrov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.#Cases T-523/21 and T-216/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.
Alexander Evgenevich Shatrov v Council of the European Union.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.
Cases T-523/21 and T-216/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.
Alexander Evgenevich Shatrov v Council of the European Union.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.
Cases T-523/21 and T-216/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:532
- Date of document:
- 13/09/2023
- Date lodged:
- 27/08/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Third countries
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- Council of the European Union, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Stancu
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62021TA0523
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12007P047: N 33
- 12008E075: N 4
- 12008E215: N 4
- 12008M029: N 4
- 32006R0765: N 4
- 32006R0765-A02P4: N 5 6
- 32006R0765-A02P5: N 5 7
- 32006R0765-N1: N 8
- 32012D0642: N 4
- 32012D0642-C4: N 48
- 32012D0642-A03P1LA: N 5 6
- 32012D0642-A04P1LA: N 5 6
- 32012D0642-A03P1LB: N 5 7
- 32012D0642-A04P1LB: N 5 7
- 32012D0642-N: N 8
- 32015Q0423(01)-A68: N 18
- 32021D1002: N 1 3 5 8 16 17 20 22 28 29 43 45 66 74 - 76 79 82 - 84 91 104
- 32021D1002-C2: N 67
- 32021R0997: N 1 3 5 8 16 17 20 22 28 29 43 45 66 74 - 76 79 82 - 84 91 104
- 32022D0307: N 1 5 14 16 17 20 22 28 29 31 43 45 56 61 66 74 91 92 95 97 - 99 101 104
- 32022R0300: N 1 5 14 16 17 20 22 28 29 31 43 45 56 61 66 74 91 92 95 97 - 99 101 104
- 62010CJ0595-N119: N 33
- 62010CJ0595-N120: N 34
- 62010CJ0595-N121: N 35
- 62010CJ0595-N124: N 36
- 62011TJ0646-N144: N 80
- 62012CJ0348-N72: N 103
- 62012TJ0058-N110: N 81
- 62014TJ0720-N51: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N52: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N53: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N54: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N55: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N56: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N57: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N58: N 94
- 62014TJ0720-N59: N 94
- 62016TJ0264-N224: N 39
- 62018TJ0166-N124: N 38
- 62018TJ0167-N93: N 37
- 62018TJ0170-N107: N 39
- 62019TJ0256-N128: N 96
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
